As I understand the term agnostic it means someone who neither believes in nor denies the existence of God but makes no assumptions about it. Leaving that aside can you be satisfied with making an assumption about God's existence? If so then that's fine but wouldn't it be better to know the truth? And if there is a God don't you think he would want us to know about his existence and make it possible to find out?
Hmm... I use a different, and as russ_watters will inevitably point out, less correct definition. Mine is that we can simply not know the truth of god's existence at the moment. But to add to it, I believe it better to live with the assumption of god's non-existence, until evidence appears to counter it. Hence, we cannot know the truth. But we can make a guess as to the general direction. As to if God wants us to know of his existence, why don't we know it? Why does the world follow different religions, and some don't believe at all? Rather, God based on faith would perhaps be dependent on us not knowing. By a crude use of the free will defence, if we could know, we cannot freely choose to suck up to God. Or so it seems.
Do the arguments really point neither way?
Yes they do, if you are prepared to contemplate the suggestion.
If God is evil why is there so much about the world that is really good? Why did the evil God make such a beautiful environment to live in? Why did the evil God give us such wonderfully designed bodies that are a masterpiece of engineering? Why did the evil God make for man a beautiful companion to love? Why would an evil God create such a marvelous experience as sex, would that even occur to an evil God? Why did the evil God give us colours, he could have made the world black and white? Why did the evil God give us a wonderful variety of foods? Why did the evil God give us music? Why did the evil God give us such wonderful brains? And a million more things that I could think of. Why if God is evil is there not widespread hatred of him?
1. Free will defence. God needs good, for there to be free will. Without free will, there can be no real suffering and guilt.
2. It's not that good. Why out of all the infinitely many better universes he could make, did he make such a bad one?
3. Because they happen to be so excellent at inflicting and taking pain, getting damaged and wounded, being ignorant... and all the other things. Is not the body of Hitler such a wonderfully designed masterpiece of engineering?
4. And then made it (biblically speaking) betray him in such a ironic and cruel fashion?
5. Because the desire for it would consume us? Interesting how sex has been a taboo for so many thousand years...
6. Why would a good god give us colours? Erm... I don't see anything good or evil about colours. Rather neutral, like it seems the nature of the universe, and any god must be.
7. If you see the sort of meals I eat each day, I would rethink that statement. Why isn't everything delicious?
8. Think of all the music you really HATE. There's your answer.
9. So we can think of many more ways of suffering and debauchery?
All statement can be turned round with more or less the same argument used to justify a good god. You just need to look on the bad side of things. Every silver lining has a big black cloud in the middle. Ah the joys of pessimism...
oh and 11:
Because he lies?