Why does i(t)=dq(t)/dt give the value of AC current only?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the interpretation of the equation i(t) = dq(t)/dt in the context of both AC and DC currents. Participants emphasize that while the equation calculates the current based on the rate of charge flow, it does not yield zero for constant currents, as the charge flow is continuous. The confusion arises from mixing up dq/dt with d²q/dt², which represent different concepts. The proper understanding is that dq/dt reflects the rate at which charges cross a reference surface, applicable to both AC and DC scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric current and charge flow
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts such as derivatives
  • Knowledge of current density and its mathematical representation
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of current density and its calculation using J = ρ.v
  • Explore the differences between AC and DC current in electrical circuits
  • Learn about the physical interpretation of charge flow in conductors
  • Investigate the implications of dq/dt versus d²q/dt² in electrical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of current flow and its mathematical representations in electrical systems.

gikiian
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I know the mathematical and geometrical reason, but does there exist a physical interpretation behind this?

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what you mean.
That formula works for DC as well. An "exotic" example would be a single electron pump where the (dc) current is given by the number of electrons pumped per second...
 
f95toli said:
I am not sure what you mean.
That formula works for DC as well. An "exotic" example would be a single electron pump where the (dc) current is given by the number of electrons pumped per second...

I don't believe it does. Say that a constant 10 Coulombs of charge per second is flowing through a conductor. This would be equivalent of 10 Amps of current. The rate of change in Coulombs per second is zero. So the equation i(t)=dq(t)/dt would yield zero also.
 
2milehi said:
I don't believe it does. Say that a constant 10 Coulombs of charge per second is flowing through a conductor. This would be equivalent of 10 Amps of current. The rate of change in Coulombs per second is zero. So the equation i(t)=dq(t)/dt would yield zero also.
!? The rate at which charges move is dq/dt. That is the current. You appear to be confusing dq/dt with d2q/dt2. The rate of change of charge flow is not the same as the rate of charge flow.

AM
 
2milehi said:
This would be equivalent of 10 Amps of current.

No, it is 10 amps of current.
 
Andrew Mason said:
!? The rate at which charges move is dq/dt. That is the current. You appear to be confusing dq/dt with d2q/dt2. The rate of change of charge flow is not the same as the rate of charge flow.

AM

Say at t = 2 seconds there is 10 Coulombs flowing in the conductor, at t = 3 seconds there is 10 Coulombs flowing in the conductor. A simplified way of figuring dq/dt would be (10 - 10) / (3 - 2) = 0. A slope of a horizontal line is always zero.

d2q/dt2 is the rate of change of the rate of change.
 
Last edited:
Say at t = 2 seconds there is 10 Coulombs flowing in the conductor

There is or there are?

But no, there are 10 coulombs per second flowing.

If you re-examine your units you will understand what everyone is telling you.
 
2milehi said:
I don't believe it does. Say that a constant 10 Coulombs of charge per second is flowing through a conductor. This would be equivalent of 10 Amps of current. The rate of change in Coulombs per second is zero. So the equation i(t)=dq(t)/dt would yield zero also.

It helps if you think in terms of current DENSITY at first:
J = ρ.v = ρ.(dx/dt)

Now consider a cross-section of your conductor and perform a surface integral, the result:
I = (dq/dx) (dx/dt) = dq/dt

So the proper interpretation of the dq/dt term is the rate of charges that cross a certain reference surface. So even for a DC current of, say, 10 A, then every second 10 C cross that surface.
 
Studiot said:
There is or there are?

But no, there are 10 coulombs per second flowing.

If you re-examine your units you will understand what everyone is telling you.

OK I get it now. I was thinking in terms of current flow, not charge flow. At t=2, 20 coulombs have flown through a conductor. At t=3 30 coulombs have flown through a conductor. So (30 - 20) / (3 - 2) = 10 coulombs per second. The coulomb count is accumulative.

Sorry for the confusion (and bad grammar) - watching a two-year old can cause a lack of concentration.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K