Why does light travel radially in the FRW universe?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the propagation of light in the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) universe and the assumption that the angular component, dΩ, vanishes for light rays. While it is argued that light rays are directed towards the center and thus have dΩ = 0, others challenge this by noting that curvature can bend light, allowing rays with non-zero angular motion to still reach the observer. The debate highlights the implications of curvature on light propagation and the validity of the original assumption in different geometries. The conversation emphasizes the need to consider how coordinate systems can affect the perception of light paths in curved spacetime. Ultimately, the relationship between light propagation and curvature remains a complex topic in cosmological models.
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
When deriving different properties from the FRW-metric $$ds^2 = -dt^2 + a^2 (d\chi^2 + S_k^2(\chi) d\Omega^2)$$ -- considering the propagation of light such that ##ds^2 = 0## -- one always assumes ##d\Omega = 0##. But how do we know that ##d\Omega## always vanish for propagating light?
 
Space news on Phys.org
This is obvious for k=0; but why is it also true for the other geometries?
 
center o bass said:
When deriving different properties from the FRW-metric $$ds^2 = -dt^2 + a^2 (d\chi^2 + S_k^2(\chi) d\Omega^2)$$ -- considering the propagation of light such that ##ds^2 = 0## -- one always assumes ##d\Omega = 0##. But how do we know that ##d\Omega## always vanish for propagating light?
In general, light rays will have non-zero angular motion. But as we are orienting the coordinate system such that we are at the center, the only light rays we see are the ones that are pointed directly towards the center. If they had non-zero ##d\Omega##, then they wouldn't be pointed directly at the center and we wouldn't see them.

Curvature doesn't change this argument at all.
 
Sounds like somebody is trying to backdoor a personal theory here.
 
Chalnoth said:
In general, light rays will have non-zero angular motion. But as we are orienting the coordinate system such that we are at the center, the only light rays we see are the ones that are pointed directly towards the center. If they had non-zero ##d\Omega##, then they wouldn't be pointed directly at the center and we wouldn't see them.

Curvature doesn't change this argument at all.

I do not see why the argument that "the only light rays we see are the ones that are pointed directly towards the center" remains true when curvature is added to the picture. This is because curvature bends light; which is indeed the reason why we can see stars that are really behind the sun (the first successful test of GR). The light that travel from these stars certainly must have dΩ≠0 for otherwise they would be absorbed by it (the sun).
 
What do you think the ##\chi## coordinate describes?

You could very well have light rays traveling along geodesics with ##d\Omega\neq 0## just as you can have straight lines in ##\mathbb R^2## that do not cross the origin. However, given a straight line you can always choose your coordinate system such that it does cross the origin.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
865
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K