When working with light-propagation in the FRW metric(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

$$ds^2 = - dt^2 + a^2 ( d\chi^2 + S_k(\chi) d\Omega^2)$$

most texts just set $$ds^2 = 0$$ and obtain the equation

$$\frac{d\chi}{dt} = - \frac{1}{a}$$

for a light-ray moving from the emitter to the observer.

Question1: Do we not strictly speaking also have to check that the above equation actually specifies a geodesic?

Setting ##ds^2 = 0## does not automatically guarantee that the obtained relation specifies a geodesic, right?

Question2: Is there a quick way to verify that the above curve indeed is a null-geodesic?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Null geodesics of the FRW metric

Loading...

Similar Threads - Null geodesics metric | Date |
---|---|

A Interpretation of covariant derivative of a vector field | Feb 15, 2018 |

A Radial, exterior, outgoing, null geodesics in Schwarzschild | May 27, 2017 |

I Null geodesics in Schwarzschild spacetime | Nov 29, 2016 |

Null geodesics and null curves | Aug 16, 2015 |

Stationary/extremal L for timelike/null/spacelike geodesics | Jul 12, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**