Why Does Mass Warp Spacetime and How Does Energy Fit In?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter guitarphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spacetime Warp
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why mass warps spacetime and how energy relates to this phenomenon. Participants explore theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical aspects of gravity, spacetime, and the nature of mass and energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Speculative

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that mass warps spacetime, but the underlying reasons for this remain elusive, with one noting that theories explaining this may not yield testable predictions.
  • There is a suggestion that energy, as a property of mass, may also contribute to the warping of spacetime, though the reasoning behind this is questioned.
  • A participant humorously notes the recursive nature of "why" questions, suggesting that each answer leads to further inquiries without reaching a fundamental explanation.
  • One participant proposes that spacetime warping could be related to quantum wavefunctions, speculating on a connection between graviton behavior and spacetime curvature.
  • Another viewpoint considers mass as a manifestation of energy in spacetime, suggesting that motion alters the distribution of energy across dimensions, leading to warps.
  • Concerns are raised about speculative theories, with reminders that the forum is intended for discussions grounded in mainstream scientific theories.
  • The principle of equivalence is mentioned as a way to understand gravitational effects, but it does not address the fundamental question of why mass creates gravity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the reasons behind mass warping spacetime. Some engage in speculative reasoning, while others emphasize the limitations of current scientific understanding regarding "why" questions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of some claims, the dependence on definitions of mass and energy, and the unresolved status of certain theoretical connections, such as between quantum mechanics and general relativity.

  • #31
jnorman said:
inre: "photons themselves cause gravitational curvature"

i do not think this is true. a photon has no location, and does not cause curvature of spacetime.
A classical electromagnetic field certainly contributes to the stress-energy tensor of the fields in spacetime, and therefore to the metric (which determines the curvature).

Things get more complicated with photons. The term is defined by quantum electrodynamics, so now we're talking about a quantum field's contribution to the metric. We seem to need a quantum theory of gravity to determine that, but there's no reason to think that it would be zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
jnorman said:
inre: "photons themselves cause gravitational curvature"

i do not think this is true. a photon has no location, and does not cause curvature of spacetime.

Actually, you have it the wrong way around. General relativity works worse for point particles (not test particles) than for spread out fields. By photons, I was referring more to classical light than to the quantum description of the photon. But classically at least, the electromagnetic field, and thus light, has a stress-energy tensor and does in fact cause gravity. The electromagnetic field is the limit of the quantum field the photon is part of, and that's why I say that "photons cause gravitational curvature".
 
  • #33
[Things get more complicated with photons. The term is defined by quantum electrodynamics, so now we're talking about a quantum field's contribution to the metric. We seem to need a quantum theory of gravity to determine that, but there's no reason to think that it would be zero.

Hopefully that result will be the theory that 'corrects' GR and current quantum mechanics near space-time singularities...divergences...like the big bang and the 'center' of a black hole.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K