Why Does Mass Warp Spacetime and How Does Energy Fit In?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter guitarphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spacetime Warp
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the relationship between mass, energy, and spacetime warping, as described by General Relativity (GR). Participants express frustration over the inability to definitively explain why mass and energy warp spacetime, highlighting the limitations of scientific inquiry into "why" questions. The conversation touches on the equivalence of gravity and acceleration, the speculative nature of theories involving gravitons, and the insights offered by string theory regarding the interaction of mass, energy, and spacetime geometry. Key references include Brian Greene's works, which provide perspectives on these complex concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Basic understanding of mass-energy equivalence
  • Familiarity with spacetime concepts
  • Knowledge of string theory fundamentals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of General Relativity on spacetime curvature
  • Explore the concept of mass-energy equivalence in detail
  • Investigate string theory and its relationship with spacetime
  • Read Brian Greene's "The Fabric of the Cosmos" for insights on acceleration and spacetime
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of gravity, spacetime, and the interplay of mass and energy.

  • #31
jnorman said:
inre: "photons themselves cause gravitational curvature"

i do not think this is true. a photon has no location, and does not cause curvature of spacetime.
A classical electromagnetic field certainly contributes to the stress-energy tensor of the fields in spacetime, and therefore to the metric (which determines the curvature).

Things get more complicated with photons. The term is defined by quantum electrodynamics, so now we're talking about a quantum field's contribution to the metric. We seem to need a quantum theory of gravity to determine that, but there's no reason to think that it would be zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
jnorman said:
inre: "photons themselves cause gravitational curvature"

i do not think this is true. a photon has no location, and does not cause curvature of spacetime.

Actually, you have it the wrong way around. General relativity works worse for point particles (not test particles) than for spread out fields. By photons, I was referring more to classical light than to the quantum description of the photon. But classically at least, the electromagnetic field, and thus light, has a stress-energy tensor and does in fact cause gravity. The electromagnetic field is the limit of the quantum field the photon is part of, and that's why I say that "photons cause gravitational curvature".
 
  • #33
[Things get more complicated with photons. The term is defined by quantum electrodynamics, so now we're talking about a quantum field's contribution to the metric. We seem to need a quantum theory of gravity to determine that, but there's no reason to think that it would be zero.

Hopefully that result will be the theory that 'corrects' GR and current quantum mechanics near space-time singularities...divergences...like the big bang and the 'center' of a black hole.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K