Why Does My Inductive Impedance Calculation Seem Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thepipersson80
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Head
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around issues with calculating inductive impedance and total impedance in RLC circuits. The user is confused about their results, particularly the large values obtained for impedance, and questions the accuracy of their calculations. A key point raised is that at low frequencies, the reactive components have minimal impact, suggesting that higher frequencies should be tested for more accurate results. Additionally, the importance of understanding significant digits in calculations is emphasized, as well as the necessity of taking the square root of the final impedance value. The user is encouraged to verify their calculations and consider using online calculators for comparison.
thepipersson80
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

Firstly I apologise that I'm even asking this... I have gone over it so many times now I don't know what to believe is the right answer, can someone please help me out and let me know where I'm going wrong PLEASE

Ok so first is the inductive impedance

Z= SQRT R^2 + (WL)^2

R = 2.7*10^6 2.7MΩ
W= 2piF = 2pi*10 2pi*10Hz
L= 300*10^-3 300mH

R^2 = 7.29*10^12
WL = 18.84955592 WL^2 = 355.3057584
R^2+WL^2 = 7.29*10^12 + 355.3057584 =7.29*10^12

How can that be right? I may of well just squared R to start with... so what am I doing wrong?

Second,

Impedance in RLC circuits

Z= SQRT R^2 +(Xl - Xc)2

W = 2piF = 628318.5307

F = 100*10^3 = 100000
C = 300*10^-6 = 3*10^-4
L = 300*10^-3 = 0.3
R = 2.7*10^6 = 2700000
Xl = WL = 188495.5592
Xc = 1/WC = 5.30516477*10-3

so R^2 +(Xl - XC)^2 = 7.325530574*10^12 and to me that just does not seem the right answer??

Can you guys see where I would be going wrong? and if so how do I put it into my calculator?
Many thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why do you think you are doing something wrong? The reactance factors are frequency dependent. What you have learned is that at 10Hz (a very low frequency) the reactive elements have very little effect. Try higher frequencies.

Side note. Do NOT copy every digit off of your calculator display. It would do you much good to find a explanation of significant digits. This bit of work will save you time and effort in the future.
 
I just don't think it's right? and when I go to a online calculator I get different answers.

My maths is not that great to say the least, so to be honest I don't know what is significant and what isn't (sorry)
 
thepipersson80 said:
I just don't think it's right? and when I go to a online calculator I get different answers.

My maths is not that great to say the least, so to be honest I don't know what is significant and what isn't (sorry)
Don't forget to take the square root, to end up with Z.
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K