Why Does Ohm's Law Hold in Resistive Materials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DougBTX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Ohm's Law serves as an empirical description of the relationship between current density and electric field in resistive materials, expressed mathematically as J = s*E, where J is current density, E is electric field, and s is conductivity. Unlike Newton's laws, which are foundational principles of motion, Ohm's Law can be derived from Maxwell's equations, highlighting its empirical nature. The law holds due to the rapid establishment of a steady state in current flow, as charge carriers achieve terminal velocity through frequent collisions. This discussion references Griffith's Electrodynamics for a deeper understanding of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with electrical conductivity and resistive materials
  • Knowledge of current density and electric field relationships
  • Basic principles of classical mechanics, particularly Newton's laws
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffith's Electrodynamics for detailed explanations of electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the concept of drift velocity in charge carriers
  • Research the differences between isotropic and anisotropic media in electrical conductivity
  • Investigate the implications of Ohm's Law in various materials beyond resistive ones
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism and material science will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the foundational principles of electrical behavior in materials.

DougBTX
Paul Tipler said:
Ohm's law is not a fundamental law of nature, like Newton's laws or the laws of thermodynamics, but rather an empirical description of a property shared by many materials

This sounds wrong to me - Ohm's laws don't apply to all materials, but Newton's laws don't apply at all speeds; what makes one more "fundamental" than the other? Is it just that it took longer for people to find exceptions?

Douglas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think he had in mind the fact that Ohm's law can be derived from a description of the behavior of charge carriers and their interaction with the material, which are basically an application of Mazwell's equations, while Newton's laws are not explained from other ("more basic") principles. In the case of Newton's laws, you either start from them, or replace them with a new description of spacetime itself.
 
Doug,

Is there any context to those comments? I think it's pointless to "debate" the matter without some context.
 
Ohms law is an empirical statement, like hookes law, "the current density is proportional to the applied force". Since the applied force is an electric voltage:

J = s*E where s is the conductivity, J is the current density and E is the electric field. This is the real ohms law, from which it is possible to derive V =IR.

If you think about it, it is surprising that ohm's law should ever hold. E accelerates charges, so as they accelerate, the current should go up! Then V = IR would depend on how long V has been running.

The solution of course (because ohm's empirical law fits the data) is that changes in the wire propagate so fast, the current quickly settles into a steady state due to collisions between electrons balancing the net acceleration due to the E field.

This is adapted from Grifith's Electrodynamics, which is a great book. He explains it better than I do.

Anyway, it should be easy now to see why Newtons laws are more fundamental (not absolutely fundamental of course) than Ohms Law.
 
Crosson,

If you think about it, it is surprising that ohm's law should ever hold. E accelerates charges, so as they accelerate, the current should go up!

Not really. The point of Ohm's Law is that in a resistive medium a charge carrier (electron) experiences so many collisions that it very quickly achieves terminal velocity (aka drift velocity). Essentially, the current density will be a function of the applied electric field [j = j(E)] and, to lowest order, the current density varies directly with E with the proportionality constant being defined as the conductivity in an isotropic medium (it's a tensor in anisotropic media).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
691
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K