Femme_physics said:
Well, they don't really represent the same thing if I got it right. Coulomb is an amount, regardless of time. Whereas ampere is an amount with respect to time. So, they're not really convertible I think.
Amok wasn't trying to say they are the same. The thing is, we are free to choose one quantity, and only one, in electromagnetism for the purpose of defining all electromagnetic units. Much as one defines the meter, second, and kilogram as base units, and then the units for velocity (m/s), force (Newtons = kg*m/s
2), etc. are all defined in terms of just the base units.
Likewise, we could choose the Coulomb as a base unit, and then define an Ampere as the current due to 1 Coulomb flowing through a wire per second. But instead, the Ampere is chosen as the base unit, and a Coulomb is defined as the charge produced by a 1 Ampere current in 1 second. (There is actually a good reason for doing it this way.)
Amok said:
And about the mole question, you answered it yourself...
Actually, she wasn't really asking about the mole. Just using it for comparison purposes, asking if there was perhaps a similar relation between the Coulomb and the electron charge. At least I
think that was Femme_physics's intent.