Why Does Potential Become Zero at 2a in Graph D?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of electric potential in relation to two concentric spheres, specifically addressing why the potential becomes zero at a distance of 2a in Graph D. The potential from a point charge is defined by the formula kq/r, and the potential difference is derived from the integral of the electric field. The conclusion drawn is that at 2a, the negative potential from the outer sphere outweighs the contribution from the inner sphere, leading to a net potential of zero. Gauss's Law confirms that the electric field outside the two spheres is non-zero, supporting the validity of Graph D as the correct representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and point charge equations
  • Familiarity with Gauss's Law and its implications for electric fields
  • Knowledge of potential difference and its calculation through integration
  • Basic grasp of spherical symmetry in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Gauss's Law in various geometries
  • Explore the concept of electric potential in multi-sphere systems
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields in regions with multiple charges
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of electric potential from charge distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching electric potential concepts, and anyone interested in advanced electrostatics and field theory.

RoboNerd
Messages
410
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Untitled.jpg


Homework Equations


I know that potential from a point charge equals kq/r and that potential difference equals - (integral of)(E dot dl)

The Attempt at a Solution

I tried to approach this problem using the point charge approach by comparing the relative values of kq/r for each sphere and then guessing which graph works from there.

I understand why there is the same potential from 0 < r < a for the right answer D, but I do not understand why the potential becomes 0 at 2a as we at 2a get a negative potential from the outer sphere that is much larger than that of the potential contributed by the inner sphere as we get infinitely closer and closer to the outer sphere, meaning that the potential should have a vertical asymptote at 2a with it becoming more negative (such as in C).

Could anyone please explain why this is the case with D being the right answer? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there an electric field in the region outside the two spheres? What does Gauss's Law have to say about this?
 
Gausses law says that the net electric field with radius greater than 2a is greater than 0, so that explains why there is a zero net electric field.

I see now why D is the right answer, thanks very much
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K