I Why Does Spectral Line Darkening Occur Despite Photon Re-Emission?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe Prendergast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
AI Thread Summary
Spectral line darkening occurs due to the absorption of photons by atoms in the sun's chromosphere, which leads to the observation of dark absorption lines on Earth. When an atom absorbs a photon, the electron transitions to an excited state and may not re-emit the photon before losing its energy through collisions in high-density environments. This results in the energy being absorbed rather than scattered, which contributes to the darkening effect. Even when scattering occurs, the change in direction does not eliminate the darkening, as the emitted photons can still be absorbed before escaping the sun. Ultimately, the combination of absorption and scattering processes leads to the observed spectral line darkening.
Joe Prendergast
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
Suppose a photon from the sun's photosphere, initially traveling toward earth, is absorbed by an atom in the sun's chromosphere. The electron then transitions to its first excited state and spectral darkening is observed at a distinct wavelength on earth. I've read that the electron only stays in its excited state for a brief instant. When the electron transitions back to its ground state it emits a photon with the same wavelength where the spectral darkening had occurred. Why would this not get rid of the darkening seen from earth? Is it because the emitted photon travels in a random direction (not necessarily toward earth)?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Joe Prendergast said:
Is it because the emitted photon travels in a random direction (not necessarily toward earth)?
Yes, that's correct.
 
That may be true in the low density chromosphere, but there is more to the question of "line darkening" (usually called absorption lines, or "Fraunhoefer lines") because most of those lines are formed in the deep photosphere where the density is very high. In very high density conditions, often when an atom absorbs a photon it experiences a collision with another particle that removes that excitation energy before the photon can be reemitted. This "absorbs" the photon instead of "scattering" it, in which case the energy shows up somewhere else in the continuum spectrum of H minus opacity, rather than in the line. So there it is not the direction the photon is traveling that gets changed, it is the wavelength where the energy eventually emerges.

And even when it is scattering that is causing the absorption line, the change in direction alone could not produce such a darkening, because the Sun is a sphere so making the light come out at a different angle means it is still seen somewhere outside the Sun, so that wavelength photon would eventually be seen coming from somewhere on the Sun by somebody (and the Earth is not in a special position to see anything different). To get a true darkening still requires absorption, it's just that if you bounce the light back downward toward the Sun, it has a good chance of being absorbed by non scattering processes before it gets out again. So absorption lines are typically caused by a combination of scattering that changes the direction and photon destruction that moves the energy out of the line bandwidth.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and BvU
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top