Why Does Sulfur Take Two Electrons from Calcium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond Elements
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electron transfer process between sulfur and calcium, as well as between magnesium and bromine, exploring the concepts of electronegativity, electron configuration, and the octet rule. Participants examine the implications of these interactions in terms of achieving stable electron configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that sulfur takes two electrons from calcium due to its higher electronegativity, aiming for a stable electron configuration similar to argon.
  • Others clarify that the notation used, such as dots and brackets, represents the valence electrons and their arrangement, with brackets grouping atoms and electrons together.
  • A participant questions how the octet rule applies to sulfur and bromine, specifically regarding the number of electrons in their valence shells before and after reactions.
  • There is a discussion about the role of d electrons, with some arguing they should be considered while others assert they can be ignored in this context.
  • Participants express confusion over the electron counts for bromine after reactions, particularly regarding the representation of electrons in diagrams and the octet rule.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the role of d electrons in bonding and the application of the octet rule, leading to multiple competing views on these topics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of electron configurations and the octet rule, as well as the treatment of d electrons in the bonding process, which remains unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts of chemistry and physics who are exploring concepts related to electron transfer, electronegativity, and atomic structure.

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2290/84419342em1.th.gif

in case A:
S has a bigger electonegative energy then Ca
so it will "take" 2 electrons from Ca inorder to be a complete gas like (Ar)

so i know why there is +2 on Ca and -2 on S .

Ca has after perfect gas 4S^2
S =[Ne]3s^2 3P^4
but there are dots and cols what they mean??

regarding B:
for Br to become a perfect gas like(Kr)
it needs to take only one electron
why there is -2 ??
and what are all the dots nere it and cols []??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Eight dots as octet (eight electrons) on the valence shell.

[] just groups atom and electrons together, so that when you write [Ca]<sup>2+</sup> or [Ca:]<sup>0+</sup> it is obvious that charge is that of the atom and the electrons together.

Where do you see -2? There are two Br<sup>-</sup> anions (each with its own octet), that gives -2 in all, but there is no individual entity with this charge in the magnesium bromide.
 
on case A
the formula for S is [Ne]3S^2 3p^4

from where in this formula i can see that there is 8 electrons on the valence shell??
 
For S2- it becomes [Ne]3s23p6 - hence the octet. [Ne]3s23p4 is a neutral S atom.
 
ok i understand case A

regarding case B:
Mg=[Ne]3s^2 so it has 2 electrons on the
valence shell before the merging.

Br=[Ar]3d^10 4s^2 4p^5
so it has 17 electrons on the
valence shell before the merging.

after the merging Br needs to take 1 electron from Mg to become neutral gas.

and for Mg to become a neutral gas we need to take 2 electrons
so we link two Br atoms

but why they present 8 dots around Br??

before it was 17 then we add 2 so we have 19
but 2*8=16

??
 
transgalactic said:
but why they present 8 dots around Br??

To get stable octet.

before it was 17 then we add 2 so we have 19
but 2*8=16

??

We don't add two electrons. We add one electron to each of the two Br atoms. You have to treat each atom separately.

d electrons can be in this case ignored, they don't play any role.
 
Last edited:
regarding case B:
before Br has 17 electrons
after the reaction each Br gets 1 electron
so each Br must have 18 electrons

but in the solution
they have only 5
??
 
Picture is fuzzy, but they have 8, just like sulfur. : on the left, : on the right (it is "Br:", not "Br."), two above and two below.
 
ok even if its 8
before Br has 17 electrons
after the reaction each Br gets 1 electron
so each Br must have 18 electrons

but in the solution
they have only 8

its not 18
??
 
  • #10
I have already explained: d electrons are ignored, they don't play any role.
 
  • #11
why egnoring
D

??
3d^10 4s^2 4p^5

they do play a role
they all
are on the
valence shell
 
  • #12
Octet rule is only a simplification. Obviously it can't work for any atom where d electrons take part in the boding, as there are 10 of them and octet calls for 8 electrons.

In this particular case s&p electrons are enough to explain what is going on, d electrons are not involved - they sit on their orbitals untouched.
 
  • #13
thanks
:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
27K
Replies
3
Views
7K