Why does tape distribute static charge unevenly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nienstien
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Static
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of static charge distribution in Scotch tape experiments, where two pieces of tape labeled as top and bottom exhibit consistent positive and negative charges, respectively. The inquiry challenges the understanding of charge distribution governed by the triboelectric series, especially in the absence of friction. The adhesive properties of the tape, which involve chemical bonding and Van der Waals attraction, are implicated in this charge separation. The Earth's electric field's influence on the charge distribution is also considered but deemed insufficient to explain the observed effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static electricity principles
  • Familiarity with the triboelectric series
  • Knowledge of adhesive properties, including chemical bonding and Van der Waals forces
  • Basic concepts of electric fields and their effects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the triboelectric series and its implications in non-friction charge transfer
  • Explore the role of Van der Waals forces in adhesive interactions
  • Investigate the effects of electric fields on charge distribution in materials
  • Conduct experiments with different adhesive materials to observe charge behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, materials scientists, and anyone interested in the principles of static electricity and adhesive properties.

Nienstien
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
There's a popular experiment where you get two pieces of Scotch tape and label one top and one bottom. You attach them together on their sticky sides and then pull them apart and they will attract showing that you can get static electricity without friction. Anyhow, when I thought about it I had a couple problems with how this worked out.

How can two like materials distribute charge unevenly? Isn't charge generally governed by the triboelectric series for non-friction events?

Also, the top tape was consistently positive and the bottom tape was consistently negative (Two top tapes from different trials would repel). This rules out a random event such as how the factory applied the adhesive.
I've researched a bit about the adhesive in tape and found that they are either chemically bonding or experiencing dispersive adhesion which involves Van der Walls attraction.

How can adhesives react like this to consistantly provide opposite charges if they are the exact same thing?

This question has been bothering me for a while and I'd like to get to the bottom of it. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to descriptions found elsewhere on the web, in this experiment the TOP tape is stuck to the smooth side of the BOTTOM tape, which explains why they acquire different charges and attract one another.
 
I've seen that version too but it works with the sticky sides facing as well which is questioning part. If you have tape you can try it for your self.
 
I wondered if it had anything to do with the Earth's electric field (which is directed downwards). In that case I'd have thought the top tape would become negative and the bottom positive. Anyway, a typical value for the field is 100 volts per metre, which is, I'd have thought, too low to cause enough charge separation for observable attraction. So I think we can rule out this explanation. Pity because it would account for the top/bottom symmetry-breaking.
 
Last edited:
Do you always pull the top tape off of the fixed lower tape.
My guess is that the moving tape will leave electrons behind and be positive.
Also, the speed of removal may affect the magnitude of the charge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
24K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K