How does charge distribute on connected conductors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the charge distribution on two connected conductors (spheres) in the presence of an electric field. Participants explore how the connection via a wire affects the charge distribution and potential of each sphere, raising questions about the implications of having the same potential.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about whether charge redistribution occurs when the spheres are connected by a wire.
  • One participant notes that the potential of the spheres is not equal before connecting the wire, with the left sphere having a higher potential than the right.
  • Another participant suggests that when the wire is connected, surface charges redistribute to equalize the potential across the entire conducting structure.
  • There is a discussion about the interaction of fields from the charges on each sphere and whether they can be ignored for simplification.
  • Some participants mention the possibility of attraction between two spheres with the same sign of net charge under certain conditions, which raises questions about intuition regarding charge interactions.
  • One participant questions how to mathematically express the new charge distribution after connecting the spheres with a wire and whether methods like the method of images apply.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the specifics of charge distribution or the implications of potential equality. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the interactions and calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps related to charge distribution and potential calculations, as well as assumptions about the independence of the fields from each sphere.

T. Centa
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is a question that is vaguely related to coursework but is more for curiosity.
Lets say there are two spheres joined by a thin wire in the presence of an electric field:
upload_2016-6-17_10-32-4.png

Assume the conductors initially have no charge. Now I am pretty sure without the wire, the charge distribution would look something like this:
upload_2016-6-17_10-33-10.png

But for the life of me I cannot figure out how it is spread when they are joined by a wire because I am not sure how having the same potential would affect their charge distributions. Any help on this would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure whether you are asking if there would be any redistribution, or you realize that there will be but do not know how to determine it.
 
I too had this doubt while studying electromagnetism. Still can't figure it out :cry:
Anyone?
 
Aniruddha@94 said:
I too had this doubt while studying electromagnetism. Still can't figure it out :cry:
Anyone?
A key question is whether you can ignore the field at each sphere that arises from the charges on the other sphere. If you cannot then even with no external field (the + charge on the left in the diagram at the start of this thread) this is quite a tricky problem. See https://arxiv.org/pdf/0906.1617.pdf.
If you can ignore the interaction of the fields from the spheres, you can treat each sphere independently as a charged conducting sphere immersed in a uniform field (parallel plates, say) and find its potential as a function of charge and radius. Then set the two potentials as equal.
 
haruspex said:
A key question is whether you can ignore the field at each sphere that arises from the charges on the other sphere.
This was actually my original doubt while studying potentials; that if two charged metal spheres are in the vicinity of each other what would the potential of each be..
Thanks for the link. The paper looks a bit long. I'll read it in some time, have an exam coming up.
 
Aniruddha@94 said:
This was actually my original doubt while studying potentials; that if two charged metal spheres are in the vicinity of each other what would the potential of each be..
Thanks for the link. The paper looks a bit long. I'll read it in some time, have an exam coming up.
To whet your appetite, as I recall, it is possible for two spheres with the same sign of net charge to attract(!)
 
haruspex said:
To whet your appetite, as I recall, it is possible for two spheres with the same sign of net charge to attract(!)
Really?! That's counterintuitive. I'll look into it as soon as I get time.
 
Aniruddha@94 said:
Really?! That's counterintuitive. I'll look into it as soon as I get time.
Consider the case of one strongly charged sphere and one neutral sphere. You agree that the induced charge separation on the neutral sphere results in an attraction, right? Now put a tiny net charge on the "neutral" sphere -- so tiny that the net force is still an attraction.

Voila. Two spheres with the same [signed] net charge and a net attraction.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
T. Centa said:
This is a question that is vaguely related to coursework but is more for curiosity.

But for the life of me I cannot figure out how it is spread when they are joined by a wire because I am not sure how having the same potential would affect their charge distributions. Any help on this would be appreciated.

The two spheres are not in the same potential BEFORE we attach the wire. The left sphere that is closest to the source charge + has higher potential ##C_1## than the right sphere ##C_2##.

When we connect the wire the surface charges redistribute so that the potential becomes everywhere (on the conducting structure consisting of the spheres and the wire) the same C, ##C_2<C<C_1##. We can easily understand why this happens if we view the structure as a unified conducting object. However I admit if we see the structure in sequential steps our intuition is bugging.
 
  • #10
jbriggs444 said:
Consider the case of one strongly charged sphere and one neutral sphere. You agree that the induced charge separation on the neutral sphere results in an attraction, right? Now put a tiny net charge on the "neutral" sphere -- so tiny that the net force is still an attraction.

Voila. Two spheres with the same [signed] net charge and a net attraction.
Yes, this was exactly my thought process. It makes sense here. But can the two spheres attract even if they have charges of equal magnitude? Attraction in this case , if it happens, seems against intuition.
Delta² said:
When we connect the wire the surface charges redistribute s that the potential becomes everywhere (on the conducting structure consisting of the spheres and the wire) the same ##C, C_2<C<C_1##
I'm still unable to express these quantities mathematically. Does it use the method of images? I still haven't learned how to use that.
 
  • #11
Delta² said:
The two spheres are not in the same potential BEFORE we attach the wire. The left sphere that is closest to the source charge + has higher potential ##C_1## than the right sphere ##C_2##.

When we connect the wire the surface charges redistribute so that the potential becomes everywhere (on the conducting structure consisting of the spheres and the wire) the same C, ##C_2<C<C_1##. We can easily understand why this happens if we view the structure as a unified conducting object. However I admit if we see the structure in sequential steps our intuition is bugging.
I may be wrong, but I think T.Centa is asking how to compute the new charge distribution.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
I may be wrong, but I think T.Centa is asking how to compute the new charge distribution.

Yes I guess so now that I read OP again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K