Why does temperature fall in endothermic process in adiabatic system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
In an endothermic process within an adiabatic system, the system absorbs energy without heat exchange with its surroundings, leading to a decrease in temperature. The energy absorbed comes from the internal energy of the system itself, effectively causing it to "consume" its own energy. This results in a reduction of kinetic energy among the molecules, which is reflected as a drop in temperature. The discussion highlights confusion around the term "surroundings," emphasizing that in this context, it refers to the system's own molecules rather than external sources. The reliability of AI tools like ChatGPT for understanding complex scientific concepts is also questioned.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
TL;DR Summary
I read in a thermodynamics book that "an endothermic process is a process in which energy is acquired from its surroundings as heat" and "when an endothermic process occurs in an adiabatic system, the temperature falls".
In addition, "not all boundaries permit the transfer of energy even though there is a temperature difference between the system and its surroundings. Boundaries that do permit the transfer of energy as heat are called diathermal; those that do not are called adiabatic."

If we have an endothermic process in an adiabatic system, the process is acquiring energy from its surroundings; yet, the adiabatic system has a boundary that does not permit transfer of energy. So how can the temperature fall?

I asked chatgpt and part of the answer was the following:

In an endothermic process, the system absorbs heat energy from its surroundings. However, since the adiabatic container does not allow heat exchange with the surroundings, the heat that is absorbed by the system stays within the system. As a result, the internal energy of the system increases because it has gained energy through the endothermic process.

Now this also doesn't make any sense to me.

The system absorbs heat energy from surroundings, but the adiabatic container does not allow this heat exchange, so the heat that is absorbed (from where???) by the system stays within the system.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Congratulations, you have just learned ChatGPT is not reliable. Simply don't ask it such questions and don't use it as a part of the learning process.

I feel like the problem boils down to lousy use of the word "surroundings".

During the endothermic adiabatic process energy is consumed by the system, but the only source of the energy is the system itself, not its "surroundings" (from which it is isolated). So if the energy is used, it is the internal energy of the system itself, and the temperature of the system goes down, in a way it "eats" itself.

However, assuming the system consist of many molecules, if you look at a single molecule within the system, it absorbs the heat for its own surroundings - that is, from other molecules within the system.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
…or the endothermic process in an adiabatic system converts kinetic energy of the particles (molecules?) into some sort of potential or chemical energy, thus leaving less kinetic energy (motion of particles in system). That is manifested as a lowering of temperature.
 
Borek said:
Congratulations, you have just learned ChatGPT is not reliable. Simply don't ask it such questions and don't use it as a part of the learning process.

I feel like the problem boils down to lousy use of the word "surroundings".

During the endothermic adiabatic process energy is consumed by the system, but the only source of the energy is the system itself, not its "surroundings" (from which it is isolated). So if the energy is used, it is the internal energy of the system itself, and the temperature of the system goes down, in a way it "eats" itself.

However, assuming the system consist of many molecules, if you look at a single molecule within the system, it absorbs the heat for its own surroundings - that is, from other molecules within the system.
Thanks for you answer but your opinion on chatgpt is just that, your opinion. It is unreliable, but this is not by any stretch equivalent to not being useful in various scenarios including the learning process.
 
Thread is paused for a bit while the OP is reminded of the PF rules on AI chatbot use in the technical forums...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top