Why does the author's answer for (b) and (c) differ from my answer of 1-0.1k?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the probability calculations for the occurrence of the digit 0 in k random digits. The original poster argues that the probability of 0 not appearing is 1 - 0.1^k, while the author claims it is 0.9^k. For part (c), the poster's calculation of the probability that neither 0 nor 1 appears is 1 - 0.1^k - 0.1^k, contrasting with the author's 0.8^k. The confusion stems from misunderstanding how to calculate the probabilities for multiple digits and their interactions. Ultimately, the correct approach involves recognizing that the probability of other digits appearing in all k slots is 0.9^k.
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
What is the probability that among k random digits (a) 0 does not appear; (b) 1 does not appear; (c)neither 0 nor 1 appears; (d) at least one of the two digits 0 and 1 does not appear ? Let A and B represents the event in (a) and (b). Express the other events in terms of A and B.
Relevant Equations
No relevant equations
(a) The probability that 0 appears k times in k random digits is 0.1k So, It does not appear in k random digits is 1 - 0.1k. But author says 0.9 k.
How is that?

(b) My answer is same as in (a) that is 1-0.1k. Author's answer is 0.9k.

(c)1 - 0.1k - 0.1k Author's answer is 0.8k. How is that?

How to answer (d) and other remaining part of the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WMDhamnekar said:
(a) The probability that 0 appears k times in k random digits is 0.1k So, It does not appear in k random digits is 1 - 0.1k.
But what about appearing k-1 times? And k-2 times? If you found the probability for any appearance, then you can subtract from one to find the probability for no appearance.
WMDhamnekar said:
But author says 0.9 k.
(probability of not appearing in slot 1)*(probability of not appearing in slot 2)... = (.9)*(.9)...
 
WMDhamnekar said:
Homework Statement:: What is the probability that among k random digits (a) 0 does not appear; (b) 1 does not appear; (c)neither 0 nor 1 appears; (d) at least one of the two digits 0 and 1 does not appear ? Let A and B represents the event in (a) and (b). Express the other events in terms of A and B.
Relevant Equations:: No relevant equations

(a) The probability that 0 appears k times in k random digits is 0.1k So, It does not appear in k random digits is 1 - 0.1k. But author says 0.9 k.
How is that?

(b) My answer is same as in (a) that is 1-0.1k. Author's answer is 0.9k.

(c)1 - 0.1k - 0.1k Author's answer is 0.8k. How is that?

How to answer (d) and other remaining part of the question?
If you use the digits ##0, 1, 2## only to simplify things and take ##k = 3##, say, then you should be able to simulate the experiment and understand what is happening. E.g. For a) you have:

111
112
121
122
211
212
221
222

That have no ##0##.

Once you understand this example, you can extend it to 0-9 and then to ##k## digits for any ##k##.
 
  • Like
Likes WMDhamnekar
WMDhamnekar said:
(a) The probability that 0 appears k times in k random digits is 0.1k So, It does not appear in k random digits is 1 - 0.1k. But author says 0.9 k.
How is that?
##0.1^k## is the probability that 0 appears in all ##k## digits. It's the probability of ##0_1 0_2 ... 0_k##.
As a sanity check, notice that as ##k## gets larger, your answer, ##1-0.1^k## approaches 1. Does that make sense? That implies that as ##k## gets huge, it becomes almost certain that no ##0## appears. In reality, as ##k## gets huge, say a million, it is almost certain that there will be at least one zero.

The correct answer is that the other digits DO appear in all ##k## places. That probability is ##0.9^k##.

Your answers to the other parts must be adjusted accordingly.
 
Last edited:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top