Why does the author's answer for (b) and (c) differ from my answer of 1-0.1k?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the probability calculations for the appearance of digits in random selections. The author asserts that the probability of 0 not appearing in k random digits is 0.9k, while the original poster claims it is 1 - 0.1k. For part (c), the author states that the probability of neither 0 nor 1 appearing is 0.8k, contradicting the original poster's calculation of 1 - 0.1k - 0.1k. The correct interpretation involves understanding that as k increases, the likelihood of at least one digit appearing approaches certainty, confirming the author's calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability concepts
  • Familiarity with random digit generation
  • Knowledge of exponential functions
  • Ability to interpret probability expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of independent events in probability
  • Learn about the binomial distribution and its applications
  • Explore simulations of random digit generation to visualize probabilities
  • Investigate the Law of Large Numbers and its implications for probability
USEFUL FOR

Students of probability theory, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding random digit probabilities and their implications in statistical analysis.

WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
378
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
What is the probability that among k random digits (a) 0 does not appear; (b) 1 does not appear; (c)neither 0 nor 1 appears; (d) at least one of the two digits 0 and 1 does not appear ? Let A and B represents the event in (a) and (b). Express the other events in terms of A and B.
Relevant Equations
No relevant equations
(a) The probability that 0 appears k times in k random digits is 0.1k So, It does not appear in k random digits is 1 - 0.1k. But author says 0.9 k.
How is that?

(b) My answer is same as in (a) that is 1-0.1k. Author's answer is 0.9k.

(c)1 - 0.1k - 0.1k Author's answer is 0.8k. How is that?

How to answer (d) and other remaining part of the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WMDhamnekar said:
(a) The probability that 0 appears k times in k random digits is 0.1k So, It does not appear in k random digits is 1 - 0.1k.
But what about appearing k-1 times? And k-2 times? If you found the probability for any appearance, then you can subtract from one to find the probability for no appearance.
WMDhamnekar said:
But author says 0.9 k.
(probability of not appearing in slot 1)*(probability of not appearing in slot 2)... = (.9)*(.9)...
 
WMDhamnekar said:
Homework Statement:: What is the probability that among k random digits (a) 0 does not appear; (b) 1 does not appear; (c)neither 0 nor 1 appears; (d) at least one of the two digits 0 and 1 does not appear ? Let A and B represents the event in (a) and (b). Express the other events in terms of A and B.
Relevant Equations:: No relevant equations

(a) The probability that 0 appears k times in k random digits is 0.1k So, It does not appear in k random digits is 1 - 0.1k. But author says 0.9 k.
How is that?

(b) My answer is same as in (a) that is 1-0.1k. Author's answer is 0.9k.

(c)1 - 0.1k - 0.1k Author's answer is 0.8k. How is that?

How to answer (d) and other remaining part of the question?
If you use the digits ##0, 1, 2## only to simplify things and take ##k = 3##, say, then you should be able to simulate the experiment and understand what is happening. E.g. For a) you have:

111
112
121
122
211
212
221
222

That have no ##0##.

Once you understand this example, you can extend it to 0-9 and then to ##k## digits for any ##k##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WMDhamnekar
WMDhamnekar said:
(a) The probability that 0 appears k times in k random digits is 0.1k So, It does not appear in k random digits is 1 - 0.1k. But author says 0.9 k.
How is that?
##0.1^k## is the probability that 0 appears in all ##k## digits. It's the probability of ##0_1 0_2 ... 0_k##.
As a sanity check, notice that as ##k## gets larger, your answer, ##1-0.1^k## approaches 1. Does that make sense? That implies that as ##k## gets huge, it becomes almost certain that no ##0## appears. In reality, as ##k## gets huge, say a million, it is almost certain that there will be at least one zero.

The correct answer is that the other digits DO appear in all ##k## places. That probability is ##0.9^k##.

Your answers to the other parts must be adjusted accordingly.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K