A Why does the description of a composite system involve a tensor product?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter prabin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Tensor
prabin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anyone answer me that why the description of composite system involve tensor product ? Is there any way to realize this intuitively ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tensor product is not only used for composite systems, even for a single particle moving in space the 3d base kets are built as a product of 1d kets

$$\left|x,y,z\right\rangle =\left|x\right\rangle \otimes\left|y\right\rangle \otimes\left|z\right\rangle $$

As I see it, the tensor product is an abstract formalization of the following fact: Let ##\psi(x_{1,}x_{2})## be a two-particle wave function and ##{\phi_{n}(x)}## an orthogonal basis of functions for the one particle Hilbert space ##L^{2}## (say, the Hermite polynomials). Then you can write ##\psi(x_{1,}x_{2})## as a linear combination of functions of the form ##\phi_{n}(x_{1})\phi_{m}(x_{2})##. If we write this using an abstract vector, we are basically defining a tensor product.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and vanhees71
The tensor product is the mathematical respresentation of two independent spaces, two independent unit vectors/kets or two independent tensors to be viewed as one. The context is linearity, and the tensor product preserves the linearity of both factors in such a way that the restriction to one of both (via the trace over the other) returns the original vector/ket/space/tensor.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Back
Top