Tensor product in Cartesian coordinates

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
I am confused. Why sometimes perturbation ##V'=\alpha xy## we can write as ##V'=\alpha x \otimes y##. I am confused because ##\otimes## is a tensor product and ##x## and ##y## are not matrices in coordinate representation. Can someone explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:
##x## and ##y## are not matrices in coordinate representation.
But they are matrices in any other representation, e.g. momentum representation. And even in coordinate representation they can be viewed as matrices, but in this representation calculations can be simplified by viewing them as ordinary numbers.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
vanhees71 said:
To explain this we need more context, i.e., which concrete example are you discussing?
For instance 2d linear harmonic oscillator with this perturbation.
 
I'm confused by your confusion.

A 1d quantum system "lives" in a Hilbert space ##\mathcal{H}_{x}## that is spanned by linear combination of base kets of the form ##\left|x\right\rangle##. You can also have another independent degree of freedom living in a Hilbert space ##\mathcal{H}_{y} ## with base kets of the form ##\left|y\right\rangle ##. Then, you can combine both degrees of freedom into a Hilbert space ##\mathcal{H}_{xy}=\mathcal{H}_{x}\otimes\mathcal{H}_{y}##, that is how the Hilbert space of a 2d quantum system is build. The base kets are of the form ##\left|xy\right\rangle \equiv\left|x\right\rangle \otimes\left|y\right\rangle ##

So ##V'=\alpha xy## is always a shorthand for ##V'=\alpha x \otimes y##, because that's how the operators acting on the Hilbert space of 2d quantum systems are build, by definition.

See Cohen-Tannoudji, quantum mechanics, vol 1, page 160.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71