Why does the given conserved quantity mean the motion is on a cone?

Click For Summary
The conservation of the quantity $$\vec J=\vec r \times\vec p +eg\frac {\vec r}{|\vec r|}$$ indicates that the motion of an electron in a magnetic field is constrained to a conical surface. The relationship $$\vec{r} \cdot \vec{J}=e g r$$ leads to the conclusion that $$\cos \vartheta=\frac{e g}{J}$$ remains constant, defining the angle of the cone. By using spherical coordinates, the position vector $$\vec{r}$$ can be expressed in terms of a fixed angle $$\vartheta$$, confirming that the trajectory is conical. Thus, the conservation law directly correlates to the geometric constraint of motion on a cone.
deuteron
Messages
64
Reaction score
14
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
TL;DR Summary: .

An electrone moves in a magnetic field ##B(\vec r)=g \frac {\vec r}{|\vec r|^3}##. Why does the conservation of the quantity $$\vec J=\vec r \times\vec p +eg\frac {\vec r}{|\vec r|}$$ mean that the motion is on the surface of a cone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this homework?
 
You multiplying ##\vec{J}## with ##\vec{r}## gives
$$\vec{r} \cdot \vec{J}=e g r.$$
Now use spherical coordinates with ##\vec{J}/J## as the polar axis. Then the equation implies
$$J x_3 =e g r \; \Rightarrow \; \cos \vartheta=\frac{x_3}{r}=\frac{e g}{J}=\text{const},$$
which is the (implicit equation of a cone).

In the spherical coordinates you thus have
$$\vec{r}=\begin{pmatrix} r \sin \vartheta \cos \varphi \\ r \sin \vartheta \sin \varphi \\ e g r/J \end{pmatrix},$$
which describes a cone since ##\vartheta=\text{const}##.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, TSny and deuteron
I want to find the solution to the integral ##\theta = \int_0^{\theta}\frac{du}{\sqrt{(c-u^2 +2u^3)}}## I can see that ##\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} = A +Bu+Cu^2## is a Weierstrass elliptic function, which can be generated from ##\Large(\normalsize\frac{du}{d\theta}\Large)\normalsize^2 = c-u^2 +2u^3## (A = 0, B=-1, C=3) So does this make my integral an elliptic integral? I haven't been able to find a table of integrals anywhere which contains an integral of this form so I'm a bit stuck. TerryW

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K