Without Lagrangian, show that angular momentum is conserved

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion establishes that rotational invariance about an axis implies the conservation of angular momentum without relying on Lagrangian mechanics or Noether's theorem. The proof utilizes vector mechanics and geometry, specifically examining the potential energy function U and its behavior under small rotations. By demonstrating that the directional derivative of U remains zero under these conditions, it concludes that the torque about the rotation axis is also zero, confirming that angular momentum is conserved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector angular momentum and torque
  • Familiarity with basic vector geometry in coordinate-free form
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Concept of potential energy functions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of rotational invariance in classical mechanics
  • Explore vector calculus applications in physics
  • Investigate alternative proofs of angular momentum conservation
  • Learn about the relationship between symmetry and conservation laws in physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and researchers interested in classical mechanics, particularly those exploring conservation laws and rotational dynamics without advanced formalism.

jack476
Messages
327
Reaction score
124

Homework Statement


I'd like to show, if possible, that rotational invariance about some axis implies that angular momentum about that axis is conserved without using the Lagrangian formalism or Noether's theorem. The only proofs I have been able to find use a Lagrangian approach and I'm wondering if it's possible to do this using only geometry and vector mechanics.

Homework Equations


Definition of vector angular momentum and torque, basic vector geometry in coordinate-free form.

The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose that the interactions of a system S with the outside world can be described in terms of a potential energy function U, and that we measure U at some point P with position vector r with respect to some coordinate system embedded in S. Suppose that S is rotated by an arbitrarily small angle Δθ about one of the axes (Δθ points in the direction of the axis). Then the position vector of point P in this new coordinate system is r+Δθr. Suppose that this has not changed the measured value of U so that U(r) - U( r+Δθr) =0. This is true for an arbitrarily small rotation and therefore $$ \lim_{\mid \Delta \vec{\theta} \times \vec{r} \mid \to 0} \frac{U(\vec{r} +\Delta {\vec{\theta}} \times \vec{r}) - U(\vec{r})}{\mid \Delta \vec{\theta} \times \vec{r} \mid} = 0$$

But this is simply the directional derivative of U in the direction of Δθr, which means that the force at point P in that direction is 0. By Newton's third law, this means that the torque about the axis of rotation experienced by S is also 0. Therefore angular momentum about that axis is constant in any motion of this system.

There's no specific thing here that I'm not sure of, I just have this nagging feeling that it shouldn't be this simple.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K