Why Does the Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm Focus on Minimizing Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yellowputty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algorithm
Click For Summary
The Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm (LMA) focuses on minimizing functions to achieve the best fit for data points by reducing the sum of the squares of the residuals. This minimization is crucial as it ensures the fitted curve closely follows the data, enhancing accuracy. The algorithm is designed to find a local minimum, which can sometimes mislead if the initial parameters are not set appropriately, potentially resulting in a poor fit. In literature, minimization refers specifically to the residuals, not the curve itself. Understanding these concepts, including the idea of a trust region, is essential for effectively applying the LMA in nonlinear fitting.
yellowputty
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello Physics Forums,

In my project work, I've had to use the LMA technique for some non linear fitting. I really want to understand what it's doing rather than just using it. I have a poor knowledge of non linear fitting so please bear with me!

When producing the line of best fit, it needs to follow the data points extremely closely, obviously. To do this it minimises the sum of the square of the residuals, correct? So when I'm reading this literature, why does it always talk about minimising the function? I understand the LMA is only able to find a local minimum and not a global one, and hence it's important to set sensible initial starting parameters.

But why does the method need to find the minimum? Is it that a local minimum that might not be the global minimum trick it into thinking it found it, and send the curve off in the wrong direction? (In my head I have the idea of an x^3 trend with an x^2 fit if that makes any sense).

When the literature is talking about minimisation, what is it referring to? The residuals or the curve itself?

Also, for bonus points, could anyone explain what a trust region is in simple terms?

Any insight at all would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K