Why does the ln(x) series converge for x=2 but not x=0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter schaefera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Series
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 9K views
schaefera
Messages
208
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This isn't really so much a homework problem as me asking a question. The Taylor Series for ln(x) centered at 1 is: sum_[0, infinity] ((-1)^((n+1)*(x-1)^n))/n, then why does it converge for the endpoint x=2, but not x=0 of the interval of convergence?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Letting x=2, you get the alternating series (-1)^(n+1)/(n), which converges by the alternating series test.
Letting x=0, don't you get (-1)^(2n+1)/n, which should also converge as an alternating series?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And now I just feel silly! I'm so used to a series having a (..+1) in the exponent to alternate, looks like I forgot how to multiply n by 2! This is what happens when I have to worry about infinity.

Thanks!