Why does the operator S_p - S_n in deuteron result in a zero expectation value?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Silversonic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deuteron Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expectation value of the operator \( S_p - S_n \) in the context of the deuteron's magnetic moment. Participants explore the implications of the deuteron's total spin quantum number \( S = 1 \) and how the operator interacts with the proton and neutron spins, examining the conditions under which the expectation value can be zero.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the expectation value of \( S_p - S_n \) and its implications for the deuteron's magnetic moment, referencing a text that suggests it cannot contribute due to the nature of the operator.
  • Another participant corrects the misunderstanding about the S = 1 states, clarifying that they are symmetric and provide specific examples of the states with different \( S_z \) values.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the action of the operator \( S_p - S_n \) on the S = 1 states, noting that it yields zero for certain states and transitions to an S = 0 state for others.
  • A participant questions how obtaining the S = 0 state leads to a zero expectation value, proposing a mathematical expression for the expectation value calculation.
  • It is noted that spin states with different values of S are orthogonal, leading to the conclusion that the inner product involving the S = 0 state and S = 1 states is zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the interpretation of the operator's action and its implications for the expectation value. While some clarify the nature of the states involved, the overall discussion remains unresolved on the implications of these findings for the expectation value.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the orthogonality of spin states and the normalization of wavefunctions, which are not fully explored or resolved.

Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hi, apologies if this is simple. I'm a bit confused with a piece of text from Introductory Nuclear Physics by Wong. It's talking about finding the expectation value of the magnetic moment of the deuteron. In the deuteron it is known the total spin quantum number is S = 1. In deriving the total \mu we have a term

< S_p - S_n> (note: this is meant to be operators).

Quoting from the text: "Since the operator S_p - S_n acts on proton and neutron spins with opposite signs, it can only connect between two states, one with S = 1, and the other with S = 0, and as a result, cannot contribute to the expectation value of interest to us here".

I'm at a bit of a loss as to what it's saying here, I know

< S_p - S_n> = \int \phi^*S_p\phi dV - \int \phi^*S_n \phi dV

where \phi is the total deuteron wavefunction. Since the deuteron is in an S = 1 state the proton and neutron either have the same spin z-component or opposite. Since really when we talk about the magnetic moment we're talking about the z-component, any state where the z-component is the same for the proton and neutron cancel out in this S_p - S_n expectation value...but what about if the spins are opposite? I don't really comprehend what the text is saying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silversonic said:
Since the deuteron is in an S = 1 state the proton and neutron either have the same spin z-component or opposite.
No, that's incorrect. The S = 1 states are the three states that are symmetric:
The state with Sz = +1 is |↑↑>,
The state with Sz = -1 is |↓↓>,
And the state with Sz = 0 is (|↑↓> + |↓↑>)/√2
The remaining state, the antisymmetric state, (|↑↓> - |↓↑>)/√2, has S = 0 and Sz = 0

Silversonic said:
"Since the operator S_p - S_n acts on proton and neutron spins with opposite signs, it can only connect between two states, one with S = 1, and the other with S = 0, and as a result, cannot contribute to the expectation value of interest to us here".
Note that
(Sp - Sn)|↑↑> = 0,
Sp - Sn)|↓↓> = 0,
and (Sp - Sn)(|↑↓> + |↓↑>)/√2 = (|↑↓> - |↓↑>)/√2.
So acting on the S = 1 states it either gives you zero, or else it gives you the S = 0 state.
 
Thanks for the reply.

Bill_K said:
No, that's incorrect. The S = 1 states are the three states that are symmetric:
The state with Sz = +1 is |↑↑>,
The state with Sz = -1 is |↓↓>,
And the state with Sz = 0 is (|↑↓> + |↓↑>)/√2
The remaining state, the antisymmetric state, (|↑↓> - |↓↑>)/√2, has S = 0 and Sz = 0

Was I incorrect because I should've said the proton and neutron have the same z-spin or are in a superposition of states with opposite z-spins?

Bill_K said:
Note that
(Sp - Sn)|↑↑> = 0,
Sp - Sn)|↓↓> = 0,
and (Sp - Sn)(|↑↓> + |↓↑>)/√2 = (|↑↓> - |↓↑>)/√2.
So acting on the S = 1 states it either gives you zero, or else it gives you the S = 0 state.

But then how does obtaining the S = 0 state create a zero expectation value? If calculating the expectation value then:

\int \phi^*\chi_{S=1}^*<S_p-S_n>\phi\chi_{S=1} dV = \int \phi^*\phi\chi_{S=1}^*\chi_{S=0} dV = \chi_{S=1}^*\chi_{S=0}

assuming the space parts are normalised. Is this final product supposed to be zero?
 
Silversonic said:
But then how does obtaining the S = 0 state create a zero expectation value? If calculating the expectation value then:

\int \phi^*\chi_{S=1}^*<S_p-S_n>\phi\chi_{S=1} dV = \int \phi^*\phi\chi_{S=1}^*\chi_{S=0} dV = \chi_{S=1}^*\chi_{S=0}

assuming the space parts are normalised. Is this final product supposed to be zero?
Spin states with different values of S are orthogonal. The S = 0 state is orthogonal to the S = 1 states, so the inner product is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K