Why Does the Set (0,2) Have No Maximum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The set (0,2) has no maximum because the definition of a maximum requires that the maximum value be included in the set. Since 2 is not part of the interval (0,2), any candidate for a maximum, such as 1.9999999999, can always be exceeded by another number within the set, such as 1.9999999999999999999999999999. This leads to the conclusion that for any number m in (0,2), there exists another number m1 defined as m1 = (2 + m) / 2, which is also in (0,2) and greater than m, creating an infinite sequence approaching 2 without ever reaching it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open intervals in mathematics
  • Familiarity with the concept of limits and convergence
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs and contradictions
  • Ability to work with real numbers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of open and closed intervals in real analysis
  • Learn about limits and sequences in calculus
  • Explore mathematical proofs, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Investigate the concept of supremum and infimum in set theory
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, anyone interested in understanding the properties of intervals and limits, and educators looking for clear explanations of mathematical concepts.

member 731016
Homework Statement
I am trying to find the maximum of the set of real numbers in the open interval ##(0,2) ##
Relevant Equations
##(0,2)##
For this,
1700712007090.png

I am trying to understand why the set ##(0,2)## has no maximum. Is it because if we say for example claim that ##a_0 = 1.9999999999## is the max of the set, then we could come along and say that ##a_0 = 1.9999999999999999999999999999## is the max, can we continue doing that a infinite number of times so long that ##a_0 < 2##.

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
I am trying to understand why the set ##(0,2)## has no maximum. Is it because if we say for example claim that ##a_0 = 1.9999999999## is the max of the set, then we could come along and say that ##a_0 = 1.9999999999999999999999999999## is the max, can we continue doing that a infinite number of times so long that ##a_0 < 2##.
Yes. Within (0,2), you can get as close as you want to 2, but 2 itself is not in the set (0,2). The definition specifies that the maximum must be in the set. So (0,2) has no maximum point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
I didn't understand your sentence after "max,".

Assume that ##(0,2)## has a maximum ##m<2.## Then ##m<m+\dfrac{2-m}{2}=\dfrac{2+m}{2}<2## which cannot be since ##m## was already the maximum. This is a contradiction, so there is no maximal number.

If you prefer the positive reasoning, then given any number ##m_0\in (0,2)## then ##m_1=\dfrac{2+m_0}{2}## is a number greater than ##m_0## and still smaller than ##2.## Now, we can proceed with that new number and define ##m_2= \dfrac{2+m_1}{2}.## This results in an infinite sequence
$$
0<m_0<m_1<m_2<\ldots < 2
$$
that gets closer and closer to ##2## but never ends. If this was what you wanted to say, then the answer is 'yes'.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K