Why Does the Upper Integration Limit Change in Quantum Mechanics Problems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration limits in quantum mechanics when analyzing a wave function in an infinite potential well. The original wave function, described by {\Phi}_3={\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}Sin({\frac{3{\pi}x}{a})}, is affected by the expansion of the well from a to 2a. The confusion arises when determining the upper limit of integration for calculating probabilities, which should be 0 to a due to the wave function being zero outside this range. The correct integral for finding the probability of the particle in states n=1 and 2 is thus <{\Theta}_n|{\Phi_3}>={\int}_0^{a}({\sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}} Sin({\frac{n{\pi}x}{2a}}))({\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}Sin({\frac{3{\pi}x}{a})})dx.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions.
  • Familiarity with infinite potential wells and their mathematical representations.
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in the context of probability calculations.
  • Basic grasp of trigonometric functions and their properties in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of wave function normalization in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of basis vectors in quantum systems, particularly in expanded potential wells.
  • Learn about the mathematical techniques for evaluating integrals involving trigonometric functions.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in quantum mechanics problems related to boundary conditions and integration limits.
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wave functions and integration in potential wells, will benefit from this discussion.

Woozie
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
By the way, this isn't a homework problem, it's self study.

Homework Statement


We're given that we have a wave function in an infinite potential well, with the well having 0 PE from 0 to a. The wave function would be described by

{\Phi}_n={\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}Sin({\frac{n{\pi}x}{a})}. It was given that the function is originally in it's second exicited state, meaning it's original state can be described by {\Phi}_3={\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}Sin({\frac{3{\pi}x}{a})}

The box is suddenly expanded, so that it's rightmost boundary is now 2a. This means the new basis vectors are of the form
|{\Theta}_n&gt;={\sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}} Sin{\frac{n{\pi}x}{2a}})

What the book asks is for me to find the probability of this particle being found in states n=1 and 2. I figured the probability of finding it in any given state would be &lt;{\Theta}_n|{\Phi_3}&gt;
={\int}_0^{2a}({\sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}} Sin({\frac{n{\pi}x}{2a}}))({\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}Sin({\frac{3{\pi}x}{a})})dx

I had no problems up to here. It's the next step in their analysis that threw me off.

={\frac{{\sqrt{2}}}{a}{\int}_0^aSin({\frac{n{\pi}x}{2a}})Sin({\frac{3{\pi}x}{a})}dx

Looks like they simplified the equation in the exact same way that I did. The problem is that the upper limit of integration has changed from 2a to a. I've been looking at this problem for a while now and I cannot figure out why the limit of integration changes. Why is it that the upper limit of integration changes from 2a to a when all they did was simplify a few terms? Shouldn't the limit of integration still be 2a? When I do use 2a, all of the probabilities vanish, so obviously I'm wrong and the book is right. I just cannot figure out why that is the case. Why does the upper limit become a instead of 2a?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't it be 0 to a from the beginning since that is the area the particle is confined to immediately after the walls have been expanded?
 
The integration is from 0 to 2a, but your initial wavefunction is zero for |x|>a
 
Galileo said:
The integration is from 0 to 2a, but your initial wavefunction is zero for |x|>a

Oh, thanks, I didn't forgot about that. Thank you.
 
Wait, in that case, shouldn't the equations be:

={\int}_0^{a}({\sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}} Sin({\frac{n{\pi}x}{2a}}))({\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}Sin({\frac{3{\pi}x}{a})})dx ?

Because the book does in fact write this integral out with 2a as the upper limit of integration.
 
Woozie said:
Wait, in that case, shouldn't the equations be:

={\int}_0^{a}({\sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}} Sin({\frac{n{\pi}x}{2a}}))({\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}Sin({\frac{3{\pi}x}{a})})dx ?

Because the book does in fact write this integral out with 2a as the upper limit of integration.

then that's a typo in the book.
 
Oh okay, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
806
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
2K