Why does the wave function have to be normalizabled

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the requirement for wave functions in quantum mechanics to be normalizable. Participants explore the implications of this requirement, particularly in relation to the behavior of wave functions as they approach infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the necessity of wave functions being normalizable and the significance of their behavior at infinity. Some seek clarification on the relationship between the wave function and probability density, while others express confusion about the mathematical implications of normalization.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the concept of normalization and its physical significance. Some have offered explanations regarding the integration of probability density and the necessity for wave functions to approach zero at infinity, while others continue to seek further clarification.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of varying levels of understanding among participants, with some expressing difficulty in grasping the concepts involved. The conversation reflects an ongoing exploration of foundational principles in quantum mechanics.

asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
why does the wave function have to be normalizable, and why does it have to go to 0 and x approaches positive/negative infinity and y approaches positive/negative infinity ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the physics involved. Here's a simple and intuitive explanation. The particle described by the wave function has to be found somewhere so the wave function must be normalizable. From this it follows that it must go to zero as x->inf.
 
@@
i still don't get it...
 
Could you be more precise about what you don't get?

[tex]\psi \psi*[/tex] is the probability density. Since the particle is certainly somewhere the probability density integrated over all space must give 1. Or in other words the particle has to be somewhere. If this is to hold psi has to go to zero at infinity.
 
when you normalize the wave function to be 1, do you mean that you do it to make sure that the biggest limit is 1? and what does 0 have to do with infinity? i only see in my textbook that the wave function has no meaning, but its square means probability, so i think I'm confused on what does the boundary limits on the integral mean...

sorry about that, I'm slow at learning things... :P
 
Ok you normalise the integral of psi^2 between the infinities (+ve and -ve)to be equal to one, i.e. you normalize so that the probability of the particle being somewhere between the origin and the infinities of all spatial dimensions is equal to one. Sensible no? Ok, if the wave function does not go to zero at the infinities then the probability of the particle being somwhere in space is equal to infinity. The reason for that is that if you integrate the probability density function over all space from infinity to infinty you get infinity, if the function does not go to zero at the infinities..., hehe, and the maximum possible value for a probability is 1... so the wavefuntion has to disappear at infinity.
 
i see now~ thank you very much for clearing that up! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K