Why does this term transform in this way?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transformation properties of the Dirac equation, specifically the term ##\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu## and its behavior under Lorentz transformations. Participants clarify that while the derivative transforms as ##\partial_\mu \to (\Lambda^{-1})^\nu_{\; \mu} \partial_\nu##, the gamma matrices ##\gamma^\mu## remain constant matrices and do not undergo transformation. The key takeaway is that the expression ##\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi## is Lorentz invariant due to the appropriate transformation of the spinor ##\psi##, not the operator itself. Misunderstandings regarding the notation and implications of transformations are also addressed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with Dirac spinors and the Dirac equation
  • Knowledge of gamma matrices and their role in quantum field theory
  • Basic grasp of differential operators and their invariance properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the transformation properties of Dirac spinors under Lorentz transformations
  • Learn about the role of gamma matrices in quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Explore the concept of Lorentz invariance in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of the Dirac equation and its implications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as students studying special relativity and particle physics.

  • #31
vanhees71 said:
A very good book about all the group-theoretical aspects is

R. U. Sexl, H. K. Urbantke, Relativity, Groups, Particles,
Springer, Wien (2001).

Thank you very much. I love those kinds of books. Have you read other books that belong to the same category as Relativity, Groups, Particles, meaning that they are meant to impart understanding? I only want books about "advanced" physics or mathematics like quantum field theory, general relativity, differential geometry, topology, and any other branches of pure mathematics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
MichaelJ12 said:
How did you go from the third line to the fourth line?
(A , B) \otimes (A^{\prime} , B^{\prime}) = (A + A^{\prime} , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus (A + A^{\prime} - 1 , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus \cdots \oplus (|A - A^{\prime}| , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus (A + A^{\prime} , B + B^{\prime} - 1) \oplus \cdots \oplus (|A - A^{\prime}| , |B - B^{\prime}|) .
Could you recommend a good book?
Almost all books on group representations in general and the representation theory of the Lorentz group \mbox{SL}(2 , \mathbb{C}) in particular teach you these stuff. The latter can be found in all textbooks on Supersymmetry.
 
  • #33
samalkhaiat said:
(A , B) \otimes (A^{\prime} , B^{\prime}) = (A + A^{\prime} , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus (A + A^{\prime} - 1 , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus \cdots \oplus (|A - A^{\prime}| , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus (A + A^{\prime} , B + B^{\prime} - 1) \oplus \cdots \oplus (|A - A^{\prime}| , |B - B^{\prime}|) .

Almost all books on group representations in general and the representation theory of the Lorentz group \mbox{SL}(2 , \mathbb{C}) in particular teach you these stuff. The latter can be found in all textbooks on Supersymmetry.

I meant where did you learn the physical meaning and significance of the gamma matrices projecting out certain spins.
 
  • #34
MichaelJ12 said:
I meant where did you learn the physical meaning and significance of the gamma matrices projecting out certain spins.
I have already said that you can learn about this stuff from all textbooks on supersymmetry. I just know this stuff because it is my business to know it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MichaelJ12 and weirdoguy
  • #35
MichaelJ12 said:
Thank you very much. I love those kinds of books. Have you read other books that belong to the same category as Relativity, Groups, Particles, meaning that they are meant to impart understanding? I only want books about "advanced" physics or mathematics like quantum field theory, general relativity, differential geometry, topology, and any other branches of pure mathematics.
Then all textbooks by Weinberg are right for you :-)).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MichaelJ12

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
479
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K