A Why does this term transform in this way?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the transformation properties of the Dirac equation and the role of gamma matrices under Lorentz transformations. Participants clarify that while the operator ##\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu## does not transform as a whole, the expression ##\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi## remains Lorentz invariant due to the appropriate transformation of the spinor ##\psi##. Confusion arises regarding the notation and implications of transformations, particularly the distinction between transformations and substitutions in equations. The conversation emphasizes that the invariance of the Dirac equation relies on the correct application of transformation laws for both coordinates and spinors. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between transformations and the invariance of physical equations in the context of special relativity.
  • #31
vanhees71 said:
A very good book about all the group-theoretical aspects is

R. U. Sexl, H. K. Urbantke, Relativity, Groups, Particles,
Springer, Wien (2001).

Thank you very much. I love those kinds of books. Have you read other books that belong to the same category as Relativity, Groups, Particles, meaning that they are meant to impart understanding? I only want books about "advanced" physics or mathematics like quantum field theory, general relativity, differential geometry, topology, and any other branches of pure mathematics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
MichaelJ12 said:
How did you go from the third line to the fourth line?
(A , B) \otimes (A^{\prime} , B^{\prime}) = (A + A^{\prime} , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus (A + A^{\prime} - 1 , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus \cdots \oplus (|A - A^{\prime}| , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus (A + A^{\prime} , B + B^{\prime} - 1) \oplus \cdots \oplus (|A - A^{\prime}| , |B - B^{\prime}|) .
Could you recommend a good book?
Almost all books on group representations in general and the representation theory of the Lorentz group \mbox{SL}(2 , \mathbb{C}) in particular teach you these stuff. The latter can be found in all textbooks on Supersymmetry.
 
  • #33
samalkhaiat said:
(A , B) \otimes (A^{\prime} , B^{\prime}) = (A + A^{\prime} , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus (A + A^{\prime} - 1 , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus \cdots \oplus (|A - A^{\prime}| , B + B^{\prime}) \oplus (A + A^{\prime} , B + B^{\prime} - 1) \oplus \cdots \oplus (|A - A^{\prime}| , |B - B^{\prime}|) .

Almost all books on group representations in general and the representation theory of the Lorentz group \mbox{SL}(2 , \mathbb{C}) in particular teach you these stuff. The latter can be found in all textbooks on Supersymmetry.

I meant where did you learn the physical meaning and significance of the gamma matrices projecting out certain spins.
 
  • #34
MichaelJ12 said:
I meant where did you learn the physical meaning and significance of the gamma matrices projecting out certain spins.
I have already said that you can learn about this stuff from all textbooks on supersymmetry. I just know this stuff because it is my business to know it.
 
  • Like
Likes MichaelJ12 and weirdoguy
  • #35
MichaelJ12 said:
Thank you very much. I love those kinds of books. Have you read other books that belong to the same category as Relativity, Groups, Particles, meaning that they are meant to impart understanding? I only want books about "advanced" physics or mathematics like quantum field theory, general relativity, differential geometry, topology, and any other branches of pure mathematics.
Then all textbooks by Weinberg are right for you :-)).
 
  • Like
Likes MichaelJ12

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
865
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K