Why Does Thrust Differ for Objects of Different Mass in Space?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkElfa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Thrust
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between thrust, mass, and acceleration of objects in space, specifically addressing why different masses require different amounts of thrust to achieve the same acceleration. The scope includes conceptual understanding and application of Newton's laws of motion in a zero-gravity environment.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why it takes more thrust to move a 1-ton object compared to a 1-pound object in the absence of gravity.
  • Another participant asserts that mass, despite being weightless in space, still requires more force to accelerate according to Newton's second law (F=ma).
  • A participant challenges the relevance of mass in the absence of weight, seeking clarification on its significance.
  • One participant explains that mass acts as resistance to acceleration, indicating that while both objects can be moved by the same force, the acceleration experienced by the more massive object will be less.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of mass in acceleration without gravity, with some agreeing on the necessity of force proportional to mass, while others question the implications of mass in a weightless context. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conceptual understanding of mass versus weight.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not clarify the definitions of mass and weight in detail, nor does it resolve the implications of these concepts in a zero-gravity environment. There are also unresolved aspects regarding the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration.

DarkElfa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've always wondered about something. If there is no gravity or resistance in space, than why does it take more thrust to move a 1 ton object than a 1 pound object. Shouldn't thy both both be equally easy to move since neither has any weight in space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Even though they may be weightless, they still have mass. Newton's third law is F=ma, therefore to accelerate the same amount, a more massive object requires more thrust (force).
 
Why does mass matter if it doesn't have weight?
 
Mass is the resistance to acceleration. Weight is only the way in which gravity effects (and is effected by) mass, but mass resists acceleration whether there is gravity or not.

Also, the same amount of force will move a 1-pound object and[i/] a 1-ton object in space; it just won't move the 1-ton object nearly as fast.
 

Similar threads

High School Trying to understand orbiting objects in space
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
High School Question about things moving through outer space
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
High School Why does a stiff boat rudder produce forward thrust when pumped left to right?
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
8K
High School How Can We Prove That Space is Expanding?
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
High School Why does Jupiter have a stronger gravitational pull than Earth?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Understanding High Thrust of Vacuum Rocket Engines
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Undergrad The initial density of an object and its compression into a black hole
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Undergrad Changing the ISS's orbital inclination to match the Moon
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Graduate What Does Space Gives Moving Orders Mean for Gravity in Einstein's Universe?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
High School Can Friction Create Preferentially Circular Orbits?
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K