Why doesn't friction force need integration if μ, m, and g are constant?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hesperides
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Hesperides
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm sure this is an easy question to answer - per the attached image, can someone please explain why the friction force has not required/been affected by integration?

My calculus is very rusty but the only reason I can think of is that μ, m and g are all constants (for the purposes of the question) and so x^1 drops in as a result of integrating x^0 - is that correct?
 

Attachments

  • Work Fdx.PNG
    Work Fdx.PNG
    7.8 KB · Views: 468
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup. The force of friction is the same at every point along the path for the reasons that you stated. Since integration is just adding up all of those amounts of friction at each point, it is the same as multiplying it by [itex]x[/itex]. In reality, as you can probably guess, the force of friction would not actually be totally constant, but the fluctuations are very small (unless you allow the block to stop at some point at which point you would need to worry about static friction).
 
It's a line integral over a distance x2 - x1...

so the constants may be moved outside the integral leaving just the displacement.