Why Doesn't Nitrous Oxide Decompose at RTP Despite Negative Gibbs Free Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quietrain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Nitrous oxide (N2O) does not decompose into nitrogen (N2) and oxygen (O2) at room temperature and pressure (RTP) despite a Gibbs free energy of -105 kJ/mol, indicating thermodynamic favorability. The reaction requires sufficient activation energy to overcome the energy barrier for bond breaking. At RTP, the temperature is insufficient for the molecules to gain the necessary energy, rendering the reaction kinetically unfavorable. Thus, while the reaction is spontaneous thermodynamically, it does not proceed without the requisite activation energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gibbs free energy and its implications in chemical reactions
  • Knowledge of activation energy and its role in reaction kinetics
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic stability concepts
  • Basic principles of chemical bonding and molecular stability
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of activation energy and its impact on reaction rates
  • Study the differences between thermodynamic and kinetic stability in chemical reactions
  • Explore the role of temperature in chemical reaction dynamics
  • Learn about transition states and their significance in reaction mechanisms
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals interested in thermodynamics and reaction kinetics, particularly those studying gas-phase reactions and molecular stability.

quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2
why doesn't nitrous oxide decompose to nitrogen and oxygen at rtp even though the gibbs free energy is -105 ?

thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Well, I'm not sure about the free energy and all, but nitrous oxide won't turn back into oxygen and nitrogen unless it receives enough energy, such as heat, to break the bonds and separate the molecule. The basic reason is that the nitrogen atoms bond with the oxygen atom and cause the oxygen to get a full electron shell, which is favorable for the oxygen. At the same time the nitrogen gets closer to a full shell as well, which is also favorable to the nitrogen.
 
yea from the chemistry point of view, it is stable, but the question ask me why it is stable even though the gibbs free energy is such a negative number.

since gibbs free energy is the measure of the spontaneity of a reaction, the lower the more readily it happens, it says that nitrous oxide will decompose. but it doesn't happen :X
 
I'm not sure, but maybe its because the free energy is only applicable to work in the system? I'm not very familiar with free energy, sorry.
 
ok thanks anyway
 
quietrain said:
why doesn't nitrous oxide decompose to nitrogen and oxygen at rtp even though the gibbs free energy is -105 ?

thanks!
A reaction may be thermodynamically favorable but not kinetically. Do you know the difference? Look it up and get back with what you found.
 
hi
negative free energy indicates that the reaction is spontanious but the reaction needs to start an activation energy
 
Last edited:
oh i see...

so if my temperature is not high enough, then the molecules do not gain enough energy in the first place to kick start the reaction, so at rtp, no reaction occur

gibbs free energy is a measure of spontaneity of the reaction, the tendency of the reaction to continue, but there is a need for a "spark" to start it?

i was looking at this link http://web.tock.com/kalee/chem32/kinT/
and i realize i actually learned before :X

but i don't remember is it physics or chemistry...

it is all about the activation energy the transition states , reactants and products

so thermodynamically, time is not considered, and so it is an indication of how stable the produce is to the reactant, so -Gibbs energy = more stable, so more favorable thermodynamically

but the activation energy , kinetically favorable, is required for the reaction to occur in the first place, and for rtp, the nitrous oxide does not get enough temp to get enough energy so it does not have enough activation energy so not kinetically favorable?

thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K