Why Doesn't the Squeeze Theorem Apply to lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{sin(x)}{x}?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter camcool21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Squeeze Theorem to the limit lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{sin(x)}{x}, concluding that the theorem does not apply due to the non-existence of the bounding limits (-1/x and 1/x) at x=0. The correct approach involves using the inequality cos(x) < sin(x)/x < 1 for -π/2 < x < π/2, which is derived from a geometric proof found in Adrian Banner's "The Calculus Lifesaver." This proof demonstrates that the limit indeed equals 1, despite the initial confusion regarding the Squeeze Theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Squeeze Theorem in calculus
  • Familiarity with limits and continuity
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Experience with geometric proofs in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Squeeze Theorem and its conditions for application
  • Learn about geometric proofs related to limits in calculus
  • Explore the implications of trigonometric inequalities in limit evaluation
  • Read Adrian Banner's "The Calculus Lifesaver" for deeper insights into calculus concepts
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, educators teaching limit concepts, and anyone seeking to clarify the application of the Squeeze Theorem in mathematical proofs.

camcool21
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I just read through a geometric proof that made complete sense to me and resulted in:

lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{sin(x)}{x} = 1

But this contradicts what I thought I knew about the squeeze/sandwich principle.

-1 < sin(x) < 1

(-1/x) < [sin(x)/x] < (1/x)

The limits at (-1/x) and (1/x) don't exist when x is zero, because the left and right hand limits are positive and negative infinity for both. Why can the limit of the term in the middle be anything other than non-existent according to the squeeze theorem? I know it must equal 1, due to the geometric proof I just read, but now I'm just confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the squeeze theorem can only be applied when both of the 'squeezing' limits exist. As you correctly point out, neither of the ones you are using exist, so your example does not say anything about the squeeze theorem. as for proving your limit, convince yourself that:

cos(x) < sin(x)/x < 1 for -pi/2 < x < pi/2

and, well, squeeze.
 
Thanks for the reply. I suppose that makes sense. If the either of the two "squeezing" functions don't have a limit, it is impossible to say anything about the middle function with the squeeze theorem.

The fact that cos(x) < sin(x)/x < 1 for -pi/2 < x < pi/2, was the result of the geometric proof I had mentioned. It's in Adrian Banner's "The Calculus Lifesaver" and it's pretty nifty. It involves comparing different areas in a sliced up chunk of the unit circle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K