Why don't ice cubes spontaneously form in a cup of water

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lymitra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Ice Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Ice cubes do not spontaneously form in a cup of water due to the principles of thermodynamics, specifically the First and Second Laws. Heat flows from warmer bodies to cooler ones, preventing the water from cooling below ambient temperature. For ice to form spontaneously, the Gibbs free energy of the water phase must exceed that of the ice phase, which can occur under specific conditions such as increased pressure. Statistical mechanics indicates that while ice formation is statistically possible, it is highly unlikely without significant changes in environmental conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of Gibbs free energy and its implications
  • Familiarity with statistical mechanics concepts
  • Basic principles of heat transfer and temperature gradients
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of pressure on phase changes in water
  • Study Gibbs free energy calculations for different phases
  • Explore statistical mechanics and its applications in thermodynamics
  • Investigate real-world examples of spontaneous freezing under extreme conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, thermodynamics enthusiasts, and professionals in fields related to physical chemistry and materials science will benefit from this discussion.

Lymitra
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Why don't ice cubes spontaneously form in a cup of water? Someone was explaining to me that for ice cubes to spontaneously form, the water molecules would have to go to a more ordered state. I know about the spontaneous symmetry breaking that occurs when water is at 0'C, but I was wondering if it's possible for the rest of the universe's entropy to increase more than the decreased entropy caused by the ice cubes forming. That way, the Second Law of Thermodynamics is not violated, and it still allows the ice cubes to form. Is this a question of chance then, that we'd have to wait a long enough cosmological time span for the entropy in all other areas of the universe to suddenly increase to such an extent as to make up for the ice cubes forming?

Thanks for answering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Before thinking about the second law of thermodynamics, you need to think about the first. Heat flows from a body at higher temperature to one at a lower temperature. So your cup won't cool down below the temperature of the ambient air.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Before thinking about the second law of thermodynamics, you need to think about the first. Heat flows from a body at higher temperature to one at a lower temperature. So your cup won't cool down below the temperature of the ambient air.

Actually the second law places the constraint on the direction of heat flow, not the first. :smile:

CS
 
You're right. :eek:

My brain is clearly broken.:blushing:
 
Vanadium 50 said:
You're right. :eek:

My brain is clearly broken.:blushing:

Just a Freudian slip I'm sure! :wink:

CS
 
They would sometimes if you waited long enough - statistical mechanics is just a matter of playing the odds.
 
mgb_phys said:
They would sometimes if you waited long enough - statistical mechanics is just a matter of playing the odds.

31 days 9 hours. No ice observed. Will keep posted february.
 
Last edited:
Lymitra said:
I was wondering if it's possible for the rest of the universe's entropy to increase more than the decreased entropy caused by the ice cubes forming.

You are describing exactly the process of cooling to 0°C and freezing. Thermal energy and entropy leave the water and move to the surrounding area; of course, the process is only spontaneous if the surroundings are at <0°C, as Vanadium 50 notes. Energy is conserved, and some extra entropy is produced because of the temperature gradient.

Freezing would be spontaneous at room temperature if you could increase the Gibbs free energy of the water phase significantly more than the ice phase. For example, a large enough increase in pressure will make the liquid phase energetically unfavorable because its specific volume is larger than that of the solid phase.

EDIT: The first line of the last paragraph should read "if you you could increase the Gibbs free energy of the water phase significantly more than you increase the Gibbs free energy of the ice phase." You only need G_\mathrm{water}&gt;G_\mathrm{ice} for spontaneity.
 
Last edited:
Maybe the ice is forming and melting rapidly all the time, and it's just happening too fast and at too small a scale for you to see?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
673