Why don't solids fuse spontaneously?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Smacal1072
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuse Solids
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of why solids do not spontaneously fuse together after being broken, using quartz as a primary example. Participants explore concepts related to energy barriers, surface energy, and the role of Gibbs Free Energy in the context of solid-state physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that after breaking a crystal, the two pieces should not spontaneously conjoin due to an energy barrier that requires activation energy to overcome before fusion can occur.
  • Another participant notes that while pressure and temperature can facilitate fusion, the surface structure of solids differs from their internal structure, impacting the fusion process.
  • A participant mentions that quartz, being silicon dioxide, behaves differently than metals regarding oxide layer formation and surface energy considerations.
  • There is a discussion about the transformation of lattice energy into surface energy when a solid is pulverized, raising a question about the heat of fusion required to melt the powder compared to a single crystal.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of considering Gibbs Free Energy, arguing that the relationship between energy and entropy must be understood when discussing the stability of crystalline phases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the factors affecting solid fusion, including the role of surface energy, activation energy, and Gibbs Free Energy. There is no consensus on a singular explanation for why solids do not spontaneously fuse.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the energy landscape involved in solid-state fusion, including the interplay between surface energy and free energy, as well as the implications of entropy changes during phase transitions.

Smacal1072
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have single crystal of Quartz, and I break it in half. It took energy to break the crystalline bonds of the crystal.

Now, I take my 2 crystals, and fit them together along the break line, so that they are flush with each other.

Why should the 2 crystals not spontaneously conjoin? If the crystalline bond is energetically favorable, what prevents the crystalline bond from re-forming?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Normally an oxide layer is formed on a free surface.
 
Thats true for most metals, but quartz is already silicon dioxide.
 
I think there's an energy barrier, so you need an activation energy before reaching the actual energy minimum (the 'fused' solid). You can get them to fuse by applying pressure and/or temperature (while remaining in the solid state).
 
You can indeed fuse solids together using pressure and high temperatures. A good example are bicrystal substrates which made by breaking a single crystal subtrate into two pieces, rotating one piece and then fusing them toghether again. This creates an artifical grain boundary which if made correctly will be very "thin", ideally a few angstrom (there are always a few defects/dislocations so the GB is a bit wider than the "ideal" case).
 
Smacal1072 said:
Thats true for most metals, but quartz is already silicon dioxide.

Even when an oxide layer isn't formed, the surface structure is often (always?) different than the internal structure.

Solid materials have a surface energy just like liquids do, only in liquids it's called "surface tension." This is one of the main deciding fators in why crystals tend to preferentially grow in some directions rather than others. In order to reduce this surface energy, the surface layers of a solid tend to reorganize.

Also, you might be interested in the related topic of contact welding.

Also, oxygen isn't the only reactive substance in the atmosphere...I wouldn't be too surprised if the surface of quartz were covered with hydroxyl groups (from reaction with water vapor) after exposure to air.
 
So theoretically, when we cut a surface perfectly, all of the energy that went into breaking the lattice is transformed into the surface energy of the new surfaces. That makes sense. Thanks for the contact welding link PhaseShifter.

Off topic just a bit, but suppose we take a solid, and pulverize it into fine particles. Since we've created a lot of surfaces, we've transformed a lot of lattice energy into surface energy. When we melt this powder, would it take less heat of fusion than melting the initial single crystal, since we've already broken the lattice bonds?
 
Unfortunately the increased surface energy is lost to the environment on phase change so no, the latent heat remains the same.

Incidentally no one has mentioned Free energy and in particular Gibbs Free Energy, in relation to your original question.

You started from the premise that the crystalline phase is energetically favourable. You need to be careful about this 'minimum energy' approach because it is not the obvious energy that tends to a minimum but something more subtle called the free energy.

The free energy is a subtle blend of the entropy gain that occurs when you disorganise a lattice and the energy that you have to put into effect the disruption. these factors often work in opposite directions so the end result is a compromise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_free_energy
 
Studiot said:
Unfortunately the increased surface energy is lost to the environment on phase change so no, the latent heat remains the same.

Incidentally no one has mentioned Free energy and in particular Gibbs Free Energy, in relation to your original question.

You started from the premise that the crystalline phase is energetically favourable. You need to be careful about this 'minimum energy' approach because it is not the obvious energy that tends to a minimum but something more subtle called the free energy.

The free energy is a subtle blend of the entropy gain that occurs when you disorganise a lattice and the energy that you have to put into effect the disruption. these factors often work in opposite directions so the end result is a compromise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_free_energy

Ah, thanks. I completely disregarded entropy. So the transition from a pulverized powder of a crystal to a single crystal is not spontaneous because it would require a decrease in entropy, and an increase in Gibbs energy. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
840
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K