Why don't we use the antiderivative factor for Average Voltage

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of average voltage using antiderivatives, specifically addressing the inclusion of a factor of ##1/\omega## in the derivation. Participants explore the implications of the integral limits and the correct setup for averaging voltage over a cycle.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a factor of ##1/\omega## should be included in the average voltage calculation, leading to the expression ##\frac{2V_p}{\pi \omega}##.
  • There are claims of a potential typo regarding the integral limits, with suggestions that the correct range should be from ##0## to ##\pi/\omega## instead of ##0## to ##\pi##.
  • One participant notes that the average is taken over a time of ##\frac{\pi}{\omega}##, which affects the factor in front of the integral.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the setup of the integral and its evaluation, indicating that the integral(s) referenced may not be correct.
  • There is acknowledgment that the original poster (OP) arrived at the correct answer despite possibly missetting the integral.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct setup of the integral and the inclusion of the factor ##1/\omega##. There is no consensus on the resolution of these issues, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in the derivation, including assumptions about the integral limits and the handling of factors during averaging. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainty regarding the correct mathematical treatment of the problem.

rtareen
Messages
162
Reaction score
32
Below is the really quick derivation for average voltage. However when we do the anti-derivative a factor of ##1/\omega## should come out and the full answer should be ##\frac{2V_p}{\pi \omega}##. So why don't we include that? What's going on?
AVG_VOLTAGE.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there's a typo. The range from ##0## to ##\pi## is not one half a cycle of ##\sin(\omega \pi)##. It's probably supposed to be the integral from ##0## to ##\pi/\omega##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, mfb and rtareen
Office_Shredder said:
I think there's a typo. The range from ##0## to ##\pi## is not one half a cycle of ##\sin(\omega \pi)##. It's probably supposed to be the integral from ##0## to ##\pi/\omega##?
I wouldn't doubt it. I already found something wrong previously in this book. It doesn't help that there's only one edition. However that doesn't solve the problem of the factor ##1/\omega## not being included?
 
It's a time average, so the factor in front of the integral gets a factor ##\omega##, too (we average over a time of ##\frac \pi \omega##).
 
rtareen said:
Below is the really quick derivation for average voltage. However when we do the anti-derivative a factor of ##1/\omega## should come out and the full answer should be ##\frac{2V_p}{\pi \omega}##. So why don't we include that? What's going on?
Do the integral (anti-derivative). The average of the voltage over half a cycle when time is the variable is the average over half a period T:$$\langle V \rangle = \frac{\int_0^{T/2}V_P\sin(\omega t)~dt}{\int_0^{T/2}dt}=\frac{ V_P\left[1-\cos\left(\frac{\omega T}{2}\right)\right]}{\omega}\times \frac{1}{\frac{T}{2}}.$$ Now substitute ##\omega T=2\pi.## What do you get?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: alan123hk
mfb said:
It's a time average, so the factor in front of the integral gets a factor ##\omega##, too (we average over a time of ##\frac \pi \omega##).
That makes it work out. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
kuruman said:
Do the integral (anti-derivative). The average of the voltage over half a cycle when time is the variable is the average over half a period T:$$\langle V \rangle = \frac{\int_0^{T/2}V_P\sin(\omega t)~dt}{\int_0^{T/2}dt}=\frac{ V_P\left[1-\cos\left(\frac{\omega T}{2}\right)\right]}{\omega}\times \frac{1}{\frac{T}{2}}.$$ Now substitute ##\omega T=2\pi.## What do you get?
I get the answer they got. After a search I realized that was the right answer. But the integral(s) they say would evaluate to that is wrong.
 
rtareen said:
I get the answer they got. After a search I realized that was the right answer. But the integral(s) they say would evaluate to that is wrong.
What integral(s) is (are) that (these) and who are they who say that?
 
kuruman said:
What integral(s) is (are) that (these) and who are they who say that?
If you look at OP you will see they got the answer right but did not set up the integral properly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
  • #10
rtareen said:
If you look at OP you will see they got the answer right but did not set up the integral properly.
Yes, I thought the reference was to some other integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
643
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K