Why don't we use the antiderivative factor for Average Voltage

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of average voltage using the integral of a sine function over half a cycle. The correct average voltage formula is established as ##\frac{2V_p}{\pi \omega}##, which incorporates a factor of ##1/\omega## that is often omitted. Participants identify a potential typo in the original setup, suggesting the integral should range from ##0## to ##\pi/\omega## instead of ##0## to ##\pi##. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the integral to achieve the accurate average voltage calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric functions, specifically sine.
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and anti-derivatives.
  • Knowledge of average value calculations over a period.
  • Basic concepts of angular frequency (##\omega##) in electrical engineering.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of average voltage in AC circuits using integrals.
  • Study the implications of angular frequency (##\omega##) in voltage calculations.
  • Learn about the properties of sine functions over different intervals.
  • Investigate common errors in integral setups in physics and engineering problems.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in analyzing AC voltage waveforms and their average values will benefit from this discussion.

rtareen
Messages
162
Reaction score
32
Below is the really quick derivation for average voltage. However when we do the anti-derivative a factor of ##1/\omega## should come out and the full answer should be ##\frac{2V_p}{\pi \omega}##. So why don't we include that? What's going on?
AVG_VOLTAGE.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there's a typo. The range from ##0## to ##\pi## is not one half a cycle of ##\sin(\omega \pi)##. It's probably supposed to be the integral from ##0## to ##\pi/\omega##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, mfb and rtareen
Office_Shredder said:
I think there's a typo. The range from ##0## to ##\pi## is not one half a cycle of ##\sin(\omega \pi)##. It's probably supposed to be the integral from ##0## to ##\pi/\omega##?
I wouldn't doubt it. I already found something wrong previously in this book. It doesn't help that there's only one edition. However that doesn't solve the problem of the factor ##1/\omega## not being included?
 
It's a time average, so the factor in front of the integral gets a factor ##\omega##, too (we average over a time of ##\frac \pi \omega##).
 
rtareen said:
Below is the really quick derivation for average voltage. However when we do the anti-derivative a factor of ##1/\omega## should come out and the full answer should be ##\frac{2V_p}{\pi \omega}##. So why don't we include that? What's going on?
Do the integral (anti-derivative). The average of the voltage over half a cycle when time is the variable is the average over half a period T:$$\langle V \rangle = \frac{\int_0^{T/2}V_P\sin(\omega t)~dt}{\int_0^{T/2}dt}=\frac{ V_P\left[1-\cos\left(\frac{\omega T}{2}\right)\right]}{\omega}\times \frac{1}{\frac{T}{2}}.$$ Now substitute ##\omega T=2\pi.## What do you get?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: alan123hk
mfb said:
It's a time average, so the factor in front of the integral gets a factor ##\omega##, too (we average over a time of ##\frac \pi \omega##).
That makes it work out. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
kuruman said:
Do the integral (anti-derivative). The average of the voltage over half a cycle when time is the variable is the average over half a period T:$$\langle V \rangle = \frac{\int_0^{T/2}V_P\sin(\omega t)~dt}{\int_0^{T/2}dt}=\frac{ V_P\left[1-\cos\left(\frac{\omega T}{2}\right)\right]}{\omega}\times \frac{1}{\frac{T}{2}}.$$ Now substitute ##\omega T=2\pi.## What do you get?
I get the answer they got. After a search I realized that was the right answer. But the integral(s) they say would evaluate to that is wrong.
 
rtareen said:
I get the answer they got. After a search I realized that was the right answer. But the integral(s) they say would evaluate to that is wrong.
What integral(s) is (are) that (these) and who are they who say that?
 
kuruman said:
What integral(s) is (are) that (these) and who are they who say that?
If you look at OP you will see they got the answer right but did not set up the integral properly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
  • #10
rtareen said:
If you look at OP you will see they got the answer right but did not set up the integral properly.
Yes, I thought the reference was to some other integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
536
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K