Why don't we use the antiderivative factor for Average Voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of average voltage and the missing factor of 1/ω in the calculations. Participants identify a potential typo in the integral limits, suggesting it should range from 0 to π/ω instead of 0 to π. They emphasize that the average voltage calculation requires considering the time average, which introduces the factor ω. Despite recognizing the correct final answer, there is consensus that the integral setup is flawed. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate integral limits in deriving the average voltage expression.
rtareen
Messages
162
Reaction score
32
Below is the really quick derivation for average voltage. However when we do the anti-derivative a factor of ##1/\omega## should come out and the full answer should be ##\frac{2V_p}{\pi \omega}##. So why don't we include that? What's going on?
AVG_VOLTAGE.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there's a typo. The range from ##0## to ##\pi## is not one half a cycle of ##\sin(\omega \pi)##. It's probably supposed to be the integral from ##0## to ##\pi/\omega##?
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE, mfb and rtareen
Office_Shredder said:
I think there's a typo. The range from ##0## to ##\pi## is not one half a cycle of ##\sin(\omega \pi)##. It's probably supposed to be the integral from ##0## to ##\pi/\omega##?
I wouldn't doubt it. I already found something wrong previously in this book. It doesn't help that there's only one edition. However that doesn't solve the problem of the factor ##1/\omega## not being included?
 
It's a time average, so the factor in front of the integral gets a factor ##\omega##, too (we average over a time of ##\frac \pi \omega##).
 
rtareen said:
Below is the really quick derivation for average voltage. However when we do the anti-derivative a factor of ##1/\omega## should come out and the full answer should be ##\frac{2V_p}{\pi \omega}##. So why don't we include that? What's going on?
Do the integral (anti-derivative). The average of the voltage over half a cycle when time is the variable is the average over half a period T:$$\langle V \rangle = \frac{\int_0^{T/2}V_P\sin(\omega t)~dt}{\int_0^{T/2}dt}=\frac{ V_P\left[1-\cos\left(\frac{\omega T}{2}\right)\right]}{\omega}\times \frac{1}{\frac{T}{2}}.$$ Now substitute ##\omega T=2\pi.## What do you get?
 
  • Like
Likes alan123hk
mfb said:
It's a time average, so the factor in front of the integral gets a factor ##\omega##, too (we average over a time of ##\frac \pi \omega##).
That makes it work out. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
kuruman said:
Do the integral (anti-derivative). The average of the voltage over half a cycle when time is the variable is the average over half a period T:$$\langle V \rangle = \frac{\int_0^{T/2}V_P\sin(\omega t)~dt}{\int_0^{T/2}dt}=\frac{ V_P\left[1-\cos\left(\frac{\omega T}{2}\right)\right]}{\omega}\times \frac{1}{\frac{T}{2}}.$$ Now substitute ##\omega T=2\pi.## What do you get?
I get the answer they got. After a search I realized that was the right answer. But the integral(s) they say would evaluate to that is wrong.
 
rtareen said:
I get the answer they got. After a search I realized that was the right answer. But the integral(s) they say would evaluate to that is wrong.
What integral(s) is (are) that (these) and who are they who say that?
 
kuruman said:
What integral(s) is (are) that (these) and who are they who say that?
If you look at OP you will see they got the answer right but did not set up the integral properly.
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman
  • #10
rtareen said:
If you look at OP you will see they got the answer right but did not set up the integral properly.
Yes, I thought the reference was to some other integral.
 
Back
Top