Why electron affinity of noble gas is endothermic?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electron affinity (EA) of Neon is endothermic due to its full valence shell, which creates a stable electronic configuration. When an additional electron is introduced, it cannot occupy the already filled valence shell but must enter a higher energy orbital in the next shell, resulting in increased energy requirements. This phenomenon is explained by the principles of quantum mechanics, specifically the relationship between the principal quantum number (n), nodal planes, and the energy levels of orbitals. The Pauli exclusion principle further dictates that each orbital can hold a maximum of two electrons, reinforcing the stability of a full shell.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electron affinity and its implications in chemistry
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics, particularly the principal quantum number (n)
  • Knowledge of the Pauli exclusion principle and its effects on electron configuration
  • Basic grasp of atomic structure, including orbitals and energy levels
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of electron affinity in noble gases and its implications in chemical reactivity
  • Study the quantum mechanical model of the atom, focusing on orbital shapes and energy levels
  • Investigate the effects of shielding and effective nuclear charge on electron behavior
  • Learn about the relationship between nodal planes and energy levels in atomic orbitals
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and researchers interested in atomic theory, quantum mechanics, and the behavior of noble gases in chemical contexts.

NuclearBoofluff
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Why is the EA of Neon endothermic even though it has a high Z eff?
Basically, what makes a full valence shell so stable?

The attempt at a solution

I know it has to do with shielding, core e-, and valence e-. But I don't know how to word it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A full valence shell is stable because it is full :-) Namely an additional electron can't be added to the valence shell but has to occupy an orbital of the next shell, which are energetically much higher because they have an additional radial node and therefore a higher kinetic energy.
 
DrDu said:
A full valence shell is stable because it is full :-) Namely an additional electron can't be added to the valence shell but has to occupy an orbital of the next shell, which are energetically much higher because they have an additional radial node and therefore a higher kinetic energy.
But that's just circular reasoning. Of course it's going to increase in energy (I thought it was potential) as it goes up. But what is the underlying mechanics behind these rules? Why is a full shell defined as a full shell; and what makes moving up an orbital/energy level so energy consuming?
 
The orbitals also of complex atoms are similar to the orbitals in the hydrogen atom. There you find that the orbitals have energies proportional to ##-1/n^2##, where n-1 is the number of nodal planes of the orbitals. This is to be expected from the wavefunctions being standing waves. The kinetic energy of standing waves increases the higher the number of nodes. In the Coulombic potential of the nucleus, this effect is partially compensated by the orbitals with more nodes becoming more extended, which however increases their potential energy. Anyhow, the quantum number n is known as the principal quantum number which defines the shell. Now due to the Pauli exclusion principle, each orbital can hold at most 2 electrons (with anti-parallel spin). There are ##n^2## orbitals for each shell n, so each shell can hold at most ##2n^2## electrons. This defines what is meant by a full shell. E.g. in He, n=1 and He has 2 electrons, in Ne, the maximal n=2 and Ne has two full shells, the one with n=1, holding 2 electrons and the one with n=2 holding 8 electrons. Any additional electron would have to go to the next shell, with much higher energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NuclearBoofluff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K