Why is the noble gas configuration inert?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons behind the inertness of noble gases and the stability associated with their electron configurations. Participants explore concepts related to atomic stability, potential energy, and the behavior of electrons in relation to nuclear charge, focusing on both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Walther Kossel and Gilbert Lewis suggest that atoms achieve stability by acquiring a noble gas configuration through electron transfer or sharing.
  • Some participants assert that a completely filled valence shell indicates lower energy, supported by the observation that atoms with filled shells have higher ionization energies compared to those with unfilled shells.
  • There is a claim that the electrostatic potential energy is lower due to effective screening of nuclear charge by electrons in noble gases, leading to a preference for atoms to attain a filled shell configuration.
  • A participant questions how a lithium ion, which has lost an electron, can have lower electrostatic potential energy despite having an electron configuration similar to helium.
  • Another participant raises the issue of whether minimal electrostatic potential energy is the sole factor contributing to the lower overall intra-atomic potential energy associated with a full valence shell.
  • Discussion includes the idea that valence electrons do not screen each other effectively from nuclear charge, affecting the perceived nuclear charge by outer electrons in different ions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the factors contributing to the stability of noble gas configurations, with some agreeing on the role of filled valence shells and electrostatic potential energy, while others challenge or seek clarification on these points. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific mechanisms that confer stability.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about electron behavior, screening effects, and potential energy without fully resolving the implications of these factors. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and lacks consensus on the underlying principles.

Cygnus X-1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Walther Kossel and Gilbert Lewis:
"During the formation of a chemical bond, atoms combine together by gaining, losing or sharing electrons in such a way that they acquire nearest noble gas configuration."

By what understanding I have so far, and do correct me if I'm wrong, atoms tend to attain a state of greater "stability" by lowering potential energy, done by gaining, sharing, or losing electrons in order to attain the nearest noble gas configuration (having a "full valence shell"). What characteristic of noble gas configuration makes it a state of lower potential energy?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cygnus X-1 said:
By what understanding I have so far, and do correct me if I'm wrong, atoms tend to attain a state of greater "stability" by lowering potential energy, done by gaining, sharing, or losing electrons in order to attain the nearest noble gas configuration (having a "full valence shell"). What characteristic of noble gas configuration makes it a state of lower potential energy?

a completely filled valance shell designates lower energy and atoms tend to go to the lowest energy state ;
thats a fact corroborated by the ionisation energy for atoms with filled up shells are are higher than the unfilled ones.
the electrostatic potential energy is also lower as the nuclear charge is screened off by the electrons and for inert gases optimum screening is present ;
so naturally the atoms like to share charge of neighbours and try to attain the " filled up" shell configuration.
 
drvrm said:
the electrostatic potential energy is also lower as the nuclear charge is screened off by the electrons and for inert gases optimum screening is present ;
so naturally the atoms like to share charge of neighbours and try to attain the " filled up" shell configuration.

If one takes, for example, a lithium ion in lithium chloride, the lithium ion has lost an electron and thus has two electrons rather than the three it previously had. As lithium has three protons, how does having two electrons lower the electrostatic potential energy even though it has the electron configuration of helium?

Furthermore, is a minimal electrostatic potential energy the only thing that makes a full valence shell have a lower overall intra-atomic potential energy?
 
The point is that the electrons in the valence shell do not screen each other well from the nuclear charge. So while the outer electron in Li sees approximately a nuclear charge of +1, the same electron will see an electric charge >+1 in the Cl- ion although the Cl atom is neutral. In addition the ions formed will attract each other. So basically the electrons tend to gather around the atom which has the highest number of valence electrons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K