Why electron affinity of noble gas is endothermic?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the endothermic nature of the electron affinity of neon, particularly exploring the stability of a full valence shell and the implications of adding an electron to a noble gas. Participants are examining the underlying principles of electron configurations and energy levels in atomic structure.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to articulate the reasons behind the stability of a full valence shell and the energy implications of adding an electron. Questions are raised about the mechanics of electron configurations and the definitions of full shells.

Discussion Status

The discussion is actively exploring various interpretations of electron affinity and the stability of noble gases. Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between energy levels and electron configurations, while others are questioning the reasoning and seeking deeper understanding of the principles involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing examination of the concepts of shielding, core electrons, and the energy dynamics associated with moving to higher energy levels. Participants are also reflecting on the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle and the structure of atomic orbitals.

NuclearBoofluff
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Why is the EA of Neon endothermic even though it has a high Z eff?
Basically, what makes a full valence shell so stable?

The attempt at a solution

I know it has to do with shielding, core e-, and valence e-. But I don't know how to word it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A full valence shell is stable because it is full :-) Namely an additional electron can't be added to the valence shell but has to occupy an orbital of the next shell, which are energetically much higher because they have an additional radial node and therefore a higher kinetic energy.
 
DrDu said:
A full valence shell is stable because it is full :-) Namely an additional electron can't be added to the valence shell but has to occupy an orbital of the next shell, which are energetically much higher because they have an additional radial node and therefore a higher kinetic energy.
But that's just circular reasoning. Of course it's going to increase in energy (I thought it was potential) as it goes up. But what is the underlying mechanics behind these rules? Why is a full shell defined as a full shell; and what makes moving up an orbital/energy level so energy consuming?
 
The orbitals also of complex atoms are similar to the orbitals in the hydrogen atom. There you find that the orbitals have energies proportional to ##-1/n^2##, where n-1 is the number of nodal planes of the orbitals. This is to be expected from the wavefunctions being standing waves. The kinetic energy of standing waves increases the higher the number of nodes. In the Coulombic potential of the nucleus, this effect is partially compensated by the orbitals with more nodes becoming more extended, which however increases their potential energy. Anyhow, the quantum number n is known as the principal quantum number which defines the shell. Now due to the Pauli exclusion principle, each orbital can hold at most 2 electrons (with anti-parallel spin). There are ##n^2## orbitals for each shell n, so each shell can hold at most ##2n^2## electrons. This defines what is meant by a full shell. E.g. in He, n=1 and He has 2 electrons, in Ne, the maximal n=2 and Ne has two full shells, the one with n=1, holding 2 electrons and the one with n=2 holding 8 electrons. Any additional electron would have to go to the next shell, with much higher energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NuclearBoofluff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K