Why Gold is more dense than lead?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yasar1967
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gold Lead
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the question of why gold is denser than lead despite lead having a higher atomic mass. Participants explore the relationship between atomic mass, atomic radius, and density, considering both theoretical and empirical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the atomic numbers of gold (79) and lead (82) and their respective densities (19,000 kg/m³ for gold and 11,000 kg/m³ for lead).
  • Another participant references scatter plots of density and discusses the periodic peaks in density relative to atomic mass, suggesting a complex relationship.
  • A participant explains that the density of an element is related to both atomic mass and atomic density, highlighting that gold atoms are more tightly packed than lead atoms due to smaller atomic radii and bond lengths.
  • Another participant emphasizes the formula for density (density = mass/volume) and suggests that both mass and volume should be considered in understanding the density differences between gold and lead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple viewpoints regarding the factors influencing density, including atomic mass, atomic radius, and packing efficiency. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on a singular explanation.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific atomic radii and bond lengths, but the implications of these measurements on density are not fully resolved. The discussion relies on empirical data and theoretical relationships without definitive conclusions.

yasar1967
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Gold has atomic number of 79 whereas Lead has 82 but lead has 11.000kg/m3 density as to Gold's 19.000kg/m3.

How come??
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Look at the scatter plots of density here.
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Au/phys.html
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Pb/phys.html

Note the periodic peaks in density, even as atomic mass is gradually increasing.


Density of an element is related to Atomic Mass and Atomic Density. Atomic mass of Au is ~197 and that of Pb ~ 207. However, when we look at the atomic radii and bond lengths, those distances are smaller for Au than Pb.

http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Au/radii.html
The atomic radius for Au is ~ 135 pm, and the Au-Au bond length ~ 288.4 pm.

http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Pb/radii.html
The atomic radius for Pb is ~ 180 pm, and the Pb-Pb bond length ~ 350.0 pm.

So the Au atoms are more tightly packed than Pb atoms, and thus even though the atomic mass of Pb (207) is greater than Au (197), the density of Au is greater than that of Pb.
 
thank you
 
density=mass/volume.
although gold has a lower atomic mass than Pb, the volume should also be considered.
that is the strucuture(size of Au/Pb and metallic bond radius...)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
954
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
32K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K