Why helicity of photon is 1 but not 3?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fxdung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicity Photon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The helicity of a photon is definitively 1, with possible values of +1 or -1 corresponding to its circular polarization states. The spin of the graviton is established as 2 due to its representation as a symmetric tensor of order 2. Elementary fermions are constrained to a spin of 1/2 because local quantum field theory necessitates this limitation. Higher spins, such as 3 or more, are not represented in local quantum field theories due to the presence of redundant degrees of freedom and the failure to define irreducible representations of the Poincare algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory principles
  • Familiarity with the Poincare group and its representations
  • Knowledge of tensor representations in physics
  • Basic concepts of gauge theories and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Quantum Field Theory Vol 1" by Steven Weinberg for foundational concepts
  • Explore the implications of the Rarita-Schwinger field for spin-3/2 particles
  • Research the Proca Lagrangian and its role in massive vector field theories
  • Investigate the literature on non-renormalizable field theories and their challenges
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, particle physics, and theoretical physics, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for researchers exploring the implications of spin and helicity in fundamental particles.

  • #31
A. Neumaier said:
The spin of the photon is 1; its helicity is +1 or -1 (if circularly polarized) or a superposition of these (otherwise).

Well said. I like to visualize photon spin 1 with 3 states as the photon axis turning to the left, turning to the right, or in some kind of stationary angle (vertical/horizontal). In any case, you never quite know for sure what you will measure since you only know the probability of getting such a measurement, a grey area if you like.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
That's a totally misleading picture of a photon. A photon is not a little billard ball with an axis!
 
  • #33
vanhees71 said:
That's a totally misleading picture of a photon. A photon is not a little billard ball with an axis!

I am not saying what a photon is or is not. I am expressing an opinion of a visual representation of a photon that I have (and like). Do you have a favorite visual representation of a photon?
 
  • #34
Theoretically, an asymptotic free photon is represented by a one-photon Fock state. The only picture of photons we should use are momentum (or transverse-momentum) (energy) distributions or detection rates of photodetectors. Everything else is misleading.
 
  • #35
vanhees71 said:
The only picture of photons we should use are momentum (or transverse-momentum) (energy) distributions or detection rates of photodetectors.
I don't believe that this is the only picture of photons you have in your mind when you calculate Feynman diagrams or think about photons traveling from the source to the detector.
 
  • #36
WRT the 3 states of a spin 1 photon, I also like this visualization of orientation of the spin axis (or the polarization angle).

photon_ket3_small.jpg


It draws out the relationship between the Dirac Bra-ket notation (In Dirac's words, "I invented the bra"), the Jones vectors and one can visualize the action of Pauli matrices on the vectors.

Here the dot represents the highest probability of angle you would measure the spin axis of the photon at, and the arrow tells you the amount the spin axis itself is turning (precessing). If you were to measure one of these photons on the same angle as the dot, it would pass for sure. If you measure it 90 degrees off the dot, you will not pass for sure. If you measure any degree in between, the probability of passing relates the Cosine of the angle.

From this, I visualize the 3 kinds of photons. 1/ spin left photons, 2/ spin right photons, 3/ photons in a weird state where you only know the probabilities of their spin axis (ie. maybe vertical or maybe horizontal or maybe whatever depending on how you measure them).
 
  • #37
If photon has tiny mass,then special relativity theory is not very precise?
 
  • #38
No, SRT stays the same. Only is the fundamental speed of SRT not the speed of electromagnetic waves in vacuo.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
14K