Why Higher Category Theory in Physics? - Comments

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relevance of higher category theory, particularly n-categories, in physics, as articulated by Patricia Ritter. Participants highlight how categorical identities facilitate the equivalence of different integral orderings over volumes, leading to a categorical formulation of higher gauge theory. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of connecting advanced mathematics to tangible physical problems, with references to works by Lawvere and recent developments in quantum field theory and solid-state physics. The consensus is that while higher category theory may seem abstract, its applications in physics, especially in areas like topological phases and gauge theory, warrant further exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of n-categories and their role in higher gauge theory
  • Familiarity with lattice gauge theory and Wilson line observables
  • Knowledge of quantum field theory, particularly the Haag-Kastler axioms
  • Basic concepts of topological phases in solid-state physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Patricia Ritter's paper on n-categories and their applications in physics
  • Explore Lawvere's book on Categories in continuum mechanics
  • Research the implications of higher homotopy theory in quantum field theory
  • Investigate recent publications on topological phases and their mathematical frameworks
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and researchers interested in the intersection of advanced mathematics and physical theories, particularly those exploring gauge theory, quantum field theory, and solid-state physics.

  • #31
[URL='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/author/urs-schreiber/']Urs Schreiber[/URL] said:
Remarkably, homotopy theory is a "smaller theory": it arises from classical theory by removing axioms from classical logic. This is the fantastic insight of homotopy type theory.

Well, larger versus smaller or simpler versus more complex depends on how you measure things. You can understand classical mathematics as being a simplification of constructive mathematics, in which you toss out distinctions. (such as the distinction between a proof of ##A## and a proof of ##\neg \neg A##)
 

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K