Emergence from the Superpoint - Comments

  • Context: Insights 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Urs Schreiber
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    emergence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "Emergence from the Superpoint," particularly in the context of brane theory and supergravity. Participants explore the implications of the brane bouquet, its mathematical underpinnings, and connections to higher-spin fields and string theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the nature of the brane bouquet's "end," suggesting it may be due to a lack of exploration or a mathematical limitation regarding fields of spin > 2.
  • There is speculation about the potential for discovering new phenomena if the restriction on higher spins is lifted, with references to ongoing interest in higher-spin fields.
  • One participant notes a possible connection between the branching levels of the brane bouquet and the fundamental representation of E11, proposing that this might indicate further mathematical structures, such as a 10-cocycle on the M5-brane super Lie 6-algebra.
  • Another participant discusses the relationship between higher-spin gauge theory and string theory, highlighting the role of L-infinity algebras and their relevance in the context of tensionless limits.
  • A new article on the topic has been shared, which discusses the classification of branes in string/M-theory and the emergence of super-Minkowski spacetimes from the superpoint.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the implications of the brane bouquet and the nature of higher-spin fields. There is no consensus on whether the brane bouquet definitively ends or continues, and the discussion remains open to various interpretations and speculative ideas.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on unresolved mathematical issues, such as the renormalizability of supergravity theories and the implications of higher-spin fields. The discussion also touches on the definitions and interpretations of concepts within the framework of string theory and supergravity.

Urs Schreiber
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
573
Reaction score
676
Urs Schreiber submitted a new PF Insights post

Emergence from the Superpoint

supergravity.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
Very nice article. Here are some typos, in case you want to publish it in a book someday:

" It is known as the curvature of the WZW for the Green-Schwarz super 2-brane in 4d." -
it seems there should be some noun after "WZW".

"On a speculative note, observe that the “branching level” 0, 1, and 2 at which the p-branes appear in the brane bouqte" - should be "bouquet".

"already back in that remarkable artice" - should be "article".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Thanks! Fixed now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In what sense does the brane bouquet "end" at the point where story ends? Does it end because people haven't explored it further? If so, exploring it further might reveal further treasures! Or does it end for some clear mathematical reason? I often hear people speak of 11-dimensional supergravity as the highest-dimensional supergravity theory that doesn't contain fields of spin > 2. But I've never been very happy with that, since the rationale seems to be that fields of spin > 2 aren't renormalizable... yet nobody has fully settled the issues of renormalizability for various supergravity theories: people seem to keep discovering unexpected cancellations. If the "ending" of the brane bouquet is defined by the requirement of no spins > 2, it would be at least mathematically interesting to drop that requirement and see what comes next - maybe some hidden treasure?

On a vaguely related note, I hear some physicists are getting interested in higher-spin fields; in fact there will be a workshop on them in Singapore:

http://www.ntu.edu.sg/ias/upcomingevents/HSGT/

But I don't know anything about this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Right, the bouquet might not end there. I don't presently know if and how it continues. But that's related to the speculative remark I made above, observing that for low values the branching level of the brane bouquet matches the level decomposition of the fundamental representation of E11 (http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/E11#FundamentalRepresentationAndBraneCharges):
for level 0 (spacetime), level 1 (M2-branes) and 2 (M5-branes). Should that be more than a coincidence, then it might point to the existence of a further 10-cocycle on the M5-brane super Lie 6-algebra corresponding to the "dual graviton" since that is what sits at level 3 in the E11 story.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: john baez
Regarding higher spin gauge theory, what I find curious is that this connects to another old appearance of L-infinity algebras in string theory that sometimes seems not to get due attention. Namely first of all, higher spin gauge theory is expected to be the tensionless limit of bosonic string field theory (http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/higher+spin+gauge+theory#ReferencesRelationToStringTheory). But, second, Zwiebach's seminal work from the 1990 (http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/string+field+theory#ReferencesHomotopyAlgebra) shows that the genus-0 n-point functions of closed bosonic strings form an L-infinity algebra, even before passing to the tensionless limit. (Hence as the tension does go to zero one should expect, up to some technical subtleties, a kind of contraction limit that takes this tensionful string field L-infinity algebra to a higher spin gauge theory.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: john baez
We now finally have an article on the topic of "Emergence from the superpoint" on the arXiv:

John Huerta and Urs Schreiber:
"M-Theory from the superpoint"
arxiv.org/abs/1702.01774
ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/M-Theory+from+the+Superpoint

Abstract: The "brane scan" classifies consistent Green--Schwarz strings and membranes in terms of the invariant cocycles on super-Minkowski spacetimes. The "brane bouquet" generalizes this by consecutively forming the invariant higher central extensions induced by these cocycles, which yields the complete brane content of string/M-theory, including the D-branes and the M5-brane, as well as the various duality relations between these. This raises the question whether the super-Minkowski spacetimes themselves arise as maximal invariant central extensions. Here we prove that they do. Starting from the simplest possible super-Minkowski spacetime, the superpoint, which has no Lorentz structure and no spinorial structure, we give a systematic process of consecutive maximal invariant central extensions, and show that it discovers the super-Minkowski spacetimes that contain superstrings, culminating in the 10- and 11-dimensional super-Minkowski spacetimes of string/M-theory and leading directly to the brane bouquet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
16K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
11K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K