Super p-Brane Theory Emerging from Super Homotopy Theory - Comments

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the emerging concepts in Super p-Brane Theory as it relates to Super Homotopy Theory, exploring theoretical frameworks, diagrams, and implications for string and M-theory. Participants engage with the content of a PF Insights post, providing comments and insights on the diagrams and theoretical implications presented.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express appreciation for the bottleneck in D=9 as depicted in the diagrams, suggesting it has significant implications.
  • One participant clarifies that the hourglass shape of the diagram is not indicative of a bottleneck in the extension process but rather illustrates the relationship between cocycles and homotopy fibers.
  • There is a discussion about T-duality on the cocycle level, with references to the Buscher rule for RR-fields and its implications for doubled superspacetimes.
  • Another participant expresses admiration for the material but indicates limitations in their mathematical understanding, specifically regarding rational homotopy theory.
  • A later reply mentions that while homotopy theory provides a comprehensive understanding, many results can be approached through more elementary means, suggesting alternative resources for different audiences.
  • One participant announces an upcoming conference related to higher structures in physics, detailing sub-themes that align with the discussion on M-branes and homotopy super Lie-n algebras.
  • There is a claim regarding new results on higher T-duality of super M-branes, including a duality-isomorphism related to moduli spaces for C-field configurations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express enthusiasm for the topic and share insights, but there are varying levels of understanding and interpretation of the diagrams and concepts discussed. No consensus is reached on the implications of the diagrams or the interpretations of T-duality.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve complex mathematical concepts that may not be fully accessible to all participants, indicating a potential gap in foundational knowledge required to engage with the material fully.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to researchers and students in theoretical physics, particularly those focused on string theory, homotopy theory, and advanced mathematical frameworks in physics.

Urs Schreiber
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
573
Reaction score
676
Urs Schreiber submitted a new PF Insights post

Super p-Brane Theory Emerging from Super Homotopy Theory
m-theory.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haelfix, bhobba and Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I like the bottleneck in D=9 in the last diagram.
 
arivero said:
I like the bottleneck in D=9 in the last diagram.

Sorry for having referred to the article for details towards the end. I now went and added a little more text to go with that last diagram. Because the reason for its hour glass look is not that there is a bottleneck in the extension process here, but because towards the right the diagram shows cocycles, and to the left it shows the homotopy fibers of these cocycles.

Namely on the right is shown the double dimensional reduction of the F1/Dp-brane cocycles for d=10 type IIA and type IIB, respectively. The triangle on the right expresses that down in 9 these become equivalent. This is T-duality on the cocycle level. Specifically, it turns out that in components this equivalence is the Buscher rule for RR-fields (derived thereby, from first principles). Now by functoriality of homotopy fibers, also the extensions classified by these cocycles become equivalent, and this is expressed by the triangle on the left. These equivalent extensions thus classified turn out to be the doubled superspacetimes with their B-field generalized geometry, and their equivalence is hence T-duality made manifest as a symmetry of the doubled spacetime.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arivero
Man that's beautiful stuff.

Wish my math was up to the full details these days.

It taps out at RHS's - that's about my limit.

Love reading your articles though.

Thanks
Bil
 
bhobba said:
Man that's beautiful stuff.

Wish my math was up to the full details these days.

It taps out at RHS's - that's about my limit.

Thanks for the feedback.

Let me amplify that while homotopy theory in general and rational homotopy theory (RHS) in particular provide the full story that I am sketching above, most of the results surveyed above may be seen already via elementary means by considering just "FDA"s as used in supergravity, augmented only by the standard algorithm for computing homotopy (co-)fibers. The lecture notes at ncatlab.org/nlab/print/geometry+of+physics+--+fundamental+super+p-branes are written for an audience with no particular background, are expository, detailed and self-contained. And for something half-way between the terse slides for the above and these full lecture notes, there is also these seminar notes: ncatlab.org/schreiber/print/Super+Lie+n-algebra+of+Super+p-branes.

(Best viewed with Firefox or one of its derivatives, since other browsers will call MathJax to render the formulas, which then takes ages.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arivero and bhobba
Maybe I may be excused for plugging a pointer related to the topic of this old PF Insights article, on matters of higher structures in physics:

There'll be a conference later this year on this topic, titled

String and M-Theory: The New Geometry of the 21st Century"
NUS Singapore, 10-14 Dec 2018

Sub-theme 1: The worldvolume theories of M-branes
  • Little string theory formulation of the M5-brane worldvolume theory.
  • Non-abelian gerbes and the higher gauge theory formulation of M5-brane worldvolume theory.
  • Three-Lie algebra/ABJM formulation of M2-brane worldvolume theory
Sub-theme 2: The role of homotopy super Lie-n algebras in M-theory
  • Homotopy super Lie-n algebras and higher WZW models of branes.
  • Homotopy super Lie-n algebras and string dualities.
Incidentally, we are finalizing some new results on this subject, the working title is Higher T-duality of super M-branes and this is what we think we claim:

We establish a higher generalization of super L-∞-algebraic T-duality of super WZW-terms for super p-branes. In particular we demonstrate spherical T-duality of super M5-branes propagating on exceptional-geometric 11d superspacetimes. Finally we observe that this constitutes a duality-isomorphism relating a priori different moduli spaces for C-field configurations in exceptional generalized geometry.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: samalkhaiat, dextercioby and Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K