Why Ignore Tension In Pulley and Work Energy Problems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of pulley and block systems in work-energy problems within dynamics. It is established that while some work is required to rotate pulleys and ropes are not massless, these factors can often be ignored due to their minimal impact compared to the work needed to lift heavy masses. The key insight is that the analysis focuses on the blocks themselves, as the effects of cables and pulleys complicate the learning process without significantly altering the outcomes. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding differing orders of magnitude in work-energy calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of work-energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with pulley systems and their mechanics
  • Knowledge of friction and its effects in mechanical systems
  • Concept of orders of magnitude in physical calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of work-energy in mechanical systems
  • Explore the effects of friction in pulley systems and gear arrangements
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of pulley systems in dynamics
  • Investigate real-world applications of pulley systems in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and educators focusing on dynamics and work-energy problems in introductory courses.

LickMyEyeball
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
A pulley and block system is a favorite type of system for analysis when considering work-energy problems in beginning dynamics.

It's commonly recommended that the best approach to the system is to write an equation for the whole system, while ignoring the work done by cables/ropes and focusing on the blocks themselves.

What is the property of rope and pulley systems that allows the analysis to ignore them in this case? I'm just curious and am looking for insight.

Thank you for your time.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It would unnecessarily complicate the analysis when the point is to learn to solve simple problems. It is true that some work is required to rotate the pulleys, ropes are not massless, etc., but in real world systems those effects are usually small compared to whatever work is required to accomplish the task as hand, such as lifting a heavy mass, and so can be ignored.
 
alan2 said:
It would unnecessarily complicate the analysis when the point is to learn to solve simple problems. It is true that some work is required to rotate the pulleys, ropes are not massless, etc., but in real world systems those effects are usually small compared to whatever work is required to accomplish the task as hand, such as lifting a heavy mass, and so can be ignored.

Thanks for your reply. So I understand that it's more a question of differing orders of magnitude, as opposed to some intrinsic property of pulley systems, say, always performing work functions that equal out to zero, for example.
 
Yes. It is akin to the perfectly frictionless surface.
 
LickMyEyeball said:
Thanks for your reply. So I understand that it's more a question of differing orders of magnitude, as opposed to some intrinsic property of pulley systems, say, always performing work functions that equal out to zero, for example.

Yes the former.

In the real world friction in pulleys and gears can't always be ignored. Particularly if you have a high ratio step-up arrangement where any friction in the output is magnified by the gear ratio to increase the required input torque considerably.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K