Why is -1^0 = -1 while (-1)^0 = 1

  • Thread starter ryan001
  • Start date
In summary, the expression (-1)^0 is evaluated as the quantity negative 1 raised to the power of 0, which follows the rule that any finite, nonzero number raised to the power of 0 is equal to 1. On the other hand, without the parentheses, the expression -1^0 is evaluated as the negative of 1 raised to the power of 0, which is equal to -1. This is due to the order of operations, where the exponent operation takes precedence over the sign change operation.
  • #1
ryan001
13
0

Homework Statement


Hi
I was wondering why is negative one in brackets to the power of zero equal to positive one( (-1)^0 = 1 ) while negative one without brackets to the power of zero is equal to negative one( -1^0 = -1 ).

Homework Equations


none

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
##x^0 = 1## for all ##x \ne 0##

The ##-## outisde the bracket is evaluated after the power is taken.
 
  • Like
Likes Buffu
  • #3
ryan001 said:
I was wondering why is negative one in brackets to the power of zero equal to positive one( (-1)^0 = 1 ) while negative one without brackets to the power of zero is equal to negative one( -1^0 = -1 ).
You can read about the Order of Operations here:

http://www.studygs.net/pemdas/

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Buffu
  • #4
ryan001 said:
I was wondering why is negative one in brackets to the power of zero equal to positive one( (-1)^0 = 1 ) while negative one without brackets to the power of zero is equal to negative one( -1^0 = -1 ).
This is so for the same reason that ##-2^2= -4## while ##(-2)^2 = 4##. As already mentioned, the reason is due to the order in which operations are applied. Without parentheses, the exponent operation takes precedence over the sign change operation. To force the sign change to happen before exponentiation, you need to use parentheses.

(I call these -- [ ] -- brackets, and these -- ( ) -- parentheses. )
 
  • #5
ryan001 said:
I was wondering why is negative one in brackets to the power of zero equal to positive one( (-1)^0 = 1 ) while negative one without brackets to the power of zero is equal to negative one( -1^0 = -1 ).
This is an issue with syntax and order of operations, not logic. The statement negative one raised to any even power, including zero, equals positive one is true. In the case of the language APL, this isn't an issue since different symbols are used for negative sign and negation or subtract: ‾1 means negative 1, while -a means to negate a and a-b means a subtract b. in APL, a * b means raise a to power b (aⅹb is used for multiplication), and ‾1 * 0 returns a 1, no parenthesis needed.

On a side note, APL evaluates expressions right to left without precedence, except for parenthesis.
 
  • #6
Thanks everyone
I still don' t get it, could someone break it down for me I read about the order of operations but this still does not make any sense to me.

" Without parentheses, the exponent operation takes precedence over the sign change operation"
What sign change operation?
 
  • #7
ryan001 said:
order of operations ... " Without parentheses, the exponent operation takes precedence over the sign change operation" What sign change operation?
The precedence of exponent operation before negation (sign change) is standard for mathematical formulas and most (but not all) programming languages. Consider the expression of a polynomial term such as ax^2, it means a(x^2), not (ax)^2, and if used in the form 0 - ax^2, it means 0 - (a(x^2)). Getting back to the example, this usage means that the order of operations for the expression -1^0 is to first evaluate 1^0 == 1, followed by evaluating -(1^0) == -(1) = -1.
 
  • #8
-1^0= -(1^0)
Now a^0=1
Therefore,
(-1^0)=1 {Note that here a= (-1) }
Mod edit: As noted by DrClaude, (-1^0) = -1, not 1. In this case (-1^0) is exactly the same as -1^0. That is, the parentheses don't have any effect.
But there is a minus sign in the first one.
So,
-1^0= -(1^0)= -(1)= -1 {Here a=1 the minus is not included with a}
Hope this solves your doubt.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
shihab-kol said:
Therefore,
(-1^0)=1 {Note that here a= (-1) }
You mean: (-1)^0 = 1
 
  • #10
Yes that's what I am trying to say
Thanks
 
  • #11
Thanks for everyone

@rcqldr and shihab-kol
"-1^0= -(1^0)= -(1)= -1"
Thanks for the breakdown helped at lot.
But I still don't quite get how (-1)^0 equals 1 how exactly do the braces change the sign?
if the braces take precedence then evaluating (-1) first still leaves you with -1^0,
Now if the exponent takes precedence how does it change the sign when working with braces?
 
  • #12
ryan001 said:
Thanks for everyone

@rcqldr and shihab-kol
"-1^0= -(1^0)= -(1)= -1"
Thanks for the breakdown helped at lot.
But I still don't quite get how (-1)^0 equals 1 how exactly do the braces change the sign?
if the braces take precedence then evaluating (-1) first still leaves you with -1^0,
Any finite, nonzero number raised to the power 0 is 1. In symbols, ##a^0 = 1##, for a finite and not equal to zero.
ryan001 said:
Now if the exponent takes precedence how does it change the sign when working with braces?
Your question isn't very clear.
##-1^0## is the same as ##-(1^0) = -(1) = -1##.

##-1^0## means the negative of ##1^0##, or -1
##(-1)^0## means the quantity negative 1 is being raised to the power zero. As I said above, any nonzero, finite number raised to power zero is 1.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
  • #13
ryan001 said:
Thanks for everyone

@rcqldr and shihab-kol
"-1^0= -(1^0)= -(1)= -1"
Thanks for the breakdown helped at lot.
But I still don't quite get how (-1)^0 equals 1 how exactly do the braces change the sign?
if the braces take precedence then evaluating (-1) first still leaves you with -1^0,
Now if the exponent takes precedence how does it change the sign when working with braces?

Let us take a real number a {A real number includes all numbers, whether integers or rationals, and so(-1) is also included}
a^0= a^(1-1) ...{As 0= (1-1)}
Now,
a^(1-1)= a^1×a^(-1) ...{As a^x × a^x= a^(x+x)= a^2x Here I am only reversing the thing i.e. I am taking a^2x first and breaking it}
a^1 × 1/a^1 .....{As a^(-x)= 1/a^x}
Now, they divide each other and so we are left with only 1.
Now, in your case this a = (-1)
-1 is a real number like a and so though it is a negative integer it still follows the above rule. You can check this by replacing a with -1 in the above process.
It will still come out as 1 as -1/-1 = +1 (the minuses cancel out)
I hope this clears your doubts.
Cheers.
 
  • #14
ryan001 said:
Thanks for everyone

@rcqldr and shihab-kol
"-1^0= -(1^0)= -(1)= -1"
Thanks for the breakdown helped at lot.
But I still don't quite get how (-1)^0 equals 1 how exactly do the braces change the sign?
if the braces take precedence then evaluating (-1) first still leaves you with -1^0,
Now if the exponent takes precedence how does it change the sign when working with braces?

It no different from:

##-(2^2) = -(4) = -4##

But

##(-2)^2 = (-2) \times (-2) = 4##

PS There is also a thing called "order of operations", which tells you that:

##-2^2##

Should be interpreted as ##-(2^2)##. So, in these cases you have to know this - the rule being that you do the power first and then apply the negative.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Thanks everyone, now it all makes sense.
 

FAQ: Why is -1^0 = -1 while (-1)^0 = 1

Why does -1 raised to the power of 0 equal -1 while (-1) raised to the power of 0 equals 1?

The difference in the result of these two expressions is due to the order of operations in mathematics. In the expression -1^0, the exponent of 0 is applied first, resulting in the value of 1, which is then negated to give the final result of -1. However, in the expression (-1)^0, the parentheses indicate that the exponent of 0 applies to the entire value of -1, resulting in the final answer of 1.

Is there a mathematical proof for why -1^0 equals -1 and (-1)^0 equals 1?

Yes, there is a mathematical proof for this result. It involves the rules of exponents and the concept of negative numbers. The proof can be found in most high school or college level algebra textbooks.

What is the significance of raising a number to the power of 0?

Raising a number to the power of 0 is significant because it always results in the value of 1. This is a fundamental property of exponents and is used in many mathematical calculations and equations.

Can this result be applied to other numbers besides -1?

Yes, the same principles apply to other numbers besides -1. For example, 2^0 = 1 and (-2)^0 = 1. The only difference is that the negative sign in front of -1 changes the final result in this specific case.

How does this result relate to the concept of zero as an exponent?

The result of -1^0 = -1 and (-1)^0 = 1 demonstrates that the value of the exponent has a significant impact on the final result. In this case, the value of 0 as an exponent results in a final answer of 1, regardless of the base number. This concept is important in understanding the rules of exponents and their applications in mathematics.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
931
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top