Why Is 686 m/s Incorrect in Physics Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of sound distance, where 686 m/s is incorrectly interpreted as the distance sound travels in two seconds. The correct interpretation is that 686 m is the distance sound travels in that time, not the distance from the sound source to the listener. The conversation emphasizes the importance of context in physics problems, particularly regarding echoes and reflections off surfaces like cliffs. Participants question whether the original question was fully understood and suggest that the OP may have overlooked key details. Ultimately, understanding the physics of sound requires careful consideration of the scenario presented.
Bruh23
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
You are standing at some distance from a rocky cliff and shout loudly. You hear the echo 2 seconds later. How far is the rocky cliff? Take the speed of sound in air as 343 m/s and round off your answer to the nearest integer (whole number).
Relevant Equations
v = Distance/Time
I brought time over to the other side and multiplied to get 686 m/s but that wasn't correct
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show your work
 
v = D/T
v*T = D/T*T
343 m/s * 2s = D
D = 686 m
 
686 m is the distance sound travels in 2 seconds. Are you 686 m away from the point where you produced the sound when you hear the echo?
 
You are doing math blindly, without consideration for context. There is a reason they've told you you're facing a rocky cliff.

Or, more simply: you have not actually answered the question asked. What is the question that was asked?
 
Why the "Physics of light and sound"?
 
nasu said:
Why the "Physics of light and sound"?
Likely the name of the chapter OP is studying.
 
1674015095339.png


Can we conclude that you figured it out?
 
nasu said:
Why the "Physics of light and sound"?
It refers to how the OP likes to dress when studying Physics. See their Avatar...

1674245512775.png
 
Back
Top