I learned gradient in 3D space. And gradients where always vectors, pointing in the direction of steepest ... and normal to the surface where the functions is constant.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

But reading one-forms , a gradient of a function is not always a vector and it has something to do with metric... Can you proof this mathematically? Or an example which disproves that a gradient is a vector? Or visualise it?

If it is not a vector a change of coordinate base is does not change the coordinates in the "correct way"?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Why is a gradient not always a vector

Loading...

Similar Threads - gradient always vector | Date |
---|---|

A How do I see a dual basis | Aug 12, 2017 |

A Methods to interpolate surfaces from gradient field? | Feb 17, 2017 |

I Difference between 1-form and gradient | Feb 6, 2017 |

I Questions about gradient and scalar product | Aug 15, 2016 |

Why is a Kähler form not always holomorphic? | Mar 6, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**