Why is cos^-1 used in the first example but not the second?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhyiscsisNeat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the use of cos^-1 in trigonometric calculations in two examples presented in a video. In the first example, the instructor explicitly states that to find the angle θ, one must use cos^-1 of a calculated value. In the second example, while the instructor arrives at a value for cos θ, she omits the explicit mention of using cos^-1 to find θ, assuming viewers understand this step. Participants express confusion over this omission, clarifying that the inverse function is still applied in the second example, just not stated directly. Understanding this concept is crucial for mastering vectors and trigonometry in physics.
PhyiscsisNeat
Mentor note: Thread moved from a homework section.
I don't know if this is the right forum, but this isn't really a homework question that I have to solve, I am just trying to get better with vectors/trig and I looked at this for basic examples. I am okay with finding x and y components, but I am unsure why the woman in the video used cos-1 in the first example to find an angle but not in the second. She breaks the second example down into one nice and neat right triangle and has all the values for all three sides in meters but doesn't use cos-1 in the second example as she did in the first, despite having all values for each side? Can anyone clarify for me?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
She ends up with ##\cos \theta## in the second example as well. Then she says what this makes ##\theta##. I guess she didn't mention taking ##\cos^{-1}## explicitly because she assumed you'd know that that is how to get from ##\cos \theta## to ##\theta##, as she showed you in the first example.
 
PeroK said:
She ends up with ##\cos \theta## in the second example as well. Then she says what this makes ##\theta##. I guess she didn't mention taking ##\cos^{-1}## explicitly because she assumed you'd know that that is how to get from ##\cos \theta## to ##\theta##, as she showed you in the first example.

I have no idea what you just said and I would very much like to understand why she uses cos-1 in the first and cos in the second :frown:
 
PhyiscsisNeat said:
I have no idea what you just said and I would very much like to understand why she uses cos-1 in the first and cos in the second :frown:

In both cases she has ##\cos \theta = ## something.

In the first example, she says ##\theta = cos^{-1} ## of that something and does the calculation

In the second example, she simply misses out that statement and tells you what she calculated ##\theta## to be. She assumed that you could work out for yourself that to go from ##\cos \theta## to ##\theta## you use ##\cos^{-1}##. She doesn't have to tell you every time!

In other words, you are not going to be told every step in every calculation every time.
 
PeroK said:
In both cases she has ##\cos \theta = ## something.

In the first example, she says ##\theta = cos^{-1} ## of that something and does the calculation

In the second example, she simply misses out that statement and tells you what she calculated ##\theta## to be. She assumed that you could work out for yourself that to go from ##\cos \theta## to ##\theta## you use ##\cos^{-1}##. She doesn't have to tell you every time!

In other words, you are not going to be told every step in every calculation every time.

Thanks. So she used cos-1 the second time as well but just didn't show it?? I googled when to use inverse trig functions and found:

"Inverse Sine, Cosine and Tangent. The inverse trigonometric functions (sin-1, cos-1, and tan-1) allow you to find the measure of an angle in a right triangle. All that you need to know are any two sides as well as how to use SOHCAHTOA."

I'm about to start the second part of an algebraic physics course/simple mechanics class and vectors have been confusing me but I think this helps a lot (if I'm reading it correctly). I can solve the word problems with algebra all day until I pass out, but throw vectors in there and I'm confused. I know how important vectors are so I hope I have figured it out. Thank you for the replies.
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K