Why is current amplitude not expressed as a function of time?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kent davidge
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 1K views
kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
I found this answer for an question of the Halliday's book but the units m².T.rad/s in the answer don't make sense with voltage. (sorry my poor english)
And I cannt understand why they haven't expressed the current as a function of time.

2ufcavn.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kent davidge said:
I found this answer for an question of the Halliday's book but the units m².rad/s in the answer don't make sense with voltage. (sorry my poor english)
And I cannt understand why they haven't expressed the current as a function of time.

2ufcavn.jpg
You have missed the T (tesla) in the permeability of free space.
 
Vagn said:
You have missed the T (tesla) in the permeability of free space.
Okay, I notice that. Can you explain me why the current was not expressed as a function of time? I learned from the Faraday's formula that the flux's variation is basically a derivative which involves the time.
 
Last edited:
Because what they wrote is the amplitude of the emf.
The amplitude is not time dependent. The formula includes the amplitude of the current, io.
 
Last edited: