Why is division not a viable operation for vectors?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter abrowaqas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division Vectors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why division is not defined for vectors, exploring the mathematical operations available for vectors and the implications of vector multiplication. Participants consider the relationship between vector operations and algebraic structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that while vector addition, subtraction, and multiplication are well-defined, division is not typically addressed in vector mathematics.
  • One participant argues that multiplication is also not universally defined for vectors, depending on the context and definitions used.
  • It is mentioned that in certain vector spaces, such as polynomials, multiplication can be defined, suggesting that the nature of the vector space affects the operations available.
  • Another participant highlights that in R^n, the dot product and cross product are specific types of vector multiplication, with the cross product potentially allowing for a discussion of division due to its properties, including zero divisors.
  • There is a suggestion that understanding division requires a clear definition of vector multiplication that returns a vector.
  • A reference to geometric algebra is provided as a potential framework for further exploration of these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of vector multiplication and its implications for defining division. There is no consensus on a singular explanation for the absence of division in vector mathematics.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the definitions and contexts of vector spaces significantly influence the operations that can be performed, including multiplication and the potential for division.

abrowaqas
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Why division is not possible between vectors?
We have seen in many books that there is vector addition, subtraction and multiplication .. but division between two vectors or more vectors is not anywhere... what is the reason of not having division in vectors.does it have any connection with projections?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abrowaqas said:
Why division is not possible between vectors?
We have seen in many books that there is vector addition, subtraction and multiplication .. but division between two vectors or more vectors is not anywhere... what is the reason of not having division in vectors.does it have any connection with projections?

Multiplication is not possible between vectors either.

Algebras (over a field), on the other hand, are essentially vectorspaces with a multiplication on them.

You may also want to look at the difference between rings and fields. This is closer to what you're interested in.
 
Tac-Tics said:
Multiplication is not possible between vectors either.

Depends upon what definition of "vector" you are using. In general Linear Algebra we have no "multiplication of vectors" but in some special vector spaces we do. For example, in the vector space of all polynomials, we can certainly define the product of "vectors". And in R^n, which is what I think the OP is talking about, we can define dot product. In R^3 specifically, we have the cross product of two vectors. That's the only product in which "division" might make sense because the dot product of two vectors is not a vector. And we know that the cross product of two parallel vectors is 0. That is, cross product has "zero divisors" so that "multiplicative inverses" are not defined for some non-zero vectors. And, therefore, we cannot define "division".

Algebras (over a field), on the other hand, are essentially vectorspaces with a multiplication on them.

You may also want to look at the difference between rings and fields. This is closer to what you're interested in.
Very good point!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K