Why is E=pc with Light's Zero Rest Mass?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Grim Shady
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation pc
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equation E=pc and its application to light, which has zero rest mass. Participants clarify that while the traditional momentum equation p=mv leads to confusion when m=0, the more general relation E^2 - (cp)^2 = (m0c^2)^2 accommodates massless particles. The resolution lies in recognizing that for massless particles like photons, momentum can still be defined through the de Broglie wavelength equation, allowing E=pc to hold true. This understanding resolves the apparent contradiction regarding the momentum of light.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's mass-energy equivalence principle
  • Familiarity with relativistic momentum equations
  • Knowledge of the de Broglie wavelength equation
  • Basic concepts of electromagnetic wave energy and momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the de Broglie wavelength equation
  • Explore the implications of massless particles in relativistic physics
  • Learn about the relationship between energy and momentum in electromagnetic waves
  • Investigate the historical context and development of the equation E=pc
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining relativity, and anyone interested in the properties of light and momentum in quantum mechanics.

Grim Shady
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was reading the derivation of this equation on hyperphysics.com and after searching all over the internet it seems that eveywhere seems to just accept this equation is valid for light, even though a rest mass of 0 would make p equal to 0.

Sorry if I'm being stupid or if this has been asked a million times before but I can't find an explanation anywhere as to why light having zero rest mass gives the equation E = pc, despite p being proportional to the (zero) rest mass of light.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


For any particle, massive or massless, the relativistic relation between mass, energy, and spatial momentum is given by

E^2 - \left( cp \right)^2 = \left( mc^2 \right)^2 .

Using m = 0 in this relation results in E = cp.
 


But surely if p = m0v/sqrt(1-v2/c2), that would make p equal to 0?
 


When v = c, that equation leads you to divide by zero, which has a mathematically undefined result. So it simply doesn't apply when v = c. The equation George showed you is more general.
 


Yeah sorry my mistake, but that still would mean that p is an undefined value, despite it being in the equation George posted.
 


It means that your equation has nothing to say on a photon's momentum, while George Jones' has.
 


But you can't just ignore the equation for momentum and state that light has a momentum, p, purely for convenience.

Unless momentum can be defined as something else, other than the equation I posted.
 


Grim Shady said:
But you can't just ignore the equation for momentum and state that light has a momentum, p, purely for convenience.

Unless momentum can be defined as something else, other than the equation I posted.


E^2 = p^2 + m_0^2

is the general formula

E = gamma m_0

applies only to massive particles

where is your lack of understanding?
 


It was in the definition of momentum itself, I've found the answer the answer anyway in the de Broglie wavelength equation, which is something I knew already was just having trouble remembering it. Cheers for the help people.
 
  • #10


Even classically, the energy and momentum densities of electromagnetic waves are related by E = pc.
 
  • #11


I think he's saying that in the equation E=pc, p=mv, so that if m=0, then p=zero, then E=0.

Unless maybe saying m=0 means that relativistic mass is zero, not rest mass?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
12K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K