Why is EMF treated as constant when internal resistance affects terminal voltage?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 3K views
Ryaners
Messages
50
Reaction score
2
I'm having a difficult time understanding why the internal resistance of the EMF source is disregarded in this problem.

1. Homework Statement

You are asked to determine the resistance per meter of a long piece of wire. You have a battery, a voltmeter, and an ammeter. You put the leads from the voltmeter across the terminals of the battery and the meter reads 12.9V. You cut of a 20m length of the wire and connect it to the battery in series with the ammeter, which reads 6.9A. You then cut off a 40m length of wire and connect it to the battery in series with the ammeter, which reads 4.2A.

Assume the voltmeter and ammeter are ideal.

##R## = resistance of one meter of wire
##I_1## = 6.9 A
##I_2## = 4.2 A
##\varepsilon## = 12.9 V
##r## = internal resistance of battery

Solution from the book:

$$40R - 20R = \frac {V}{I_2} - \frac {V}{I_1}
\\ \Rightarrow R = \frac {V}{20} \left( \frac {1}{I_2} - \frac {1}{I_1} \right)
\\= \frac {12.9 V}{20} \left( \frac {1}{4.2 A} - \frac {1}{6.9 A} \right)
\\= 0.060 \Omega $$

Why I'm confused:

I understand that, when attaching the (ideal) voltmeter across the battery terminals, the resistance is infinite & no current flows, therefore ##V_{ab} = \varepsilon - Ir = \varepsilon## (no current ∴ no dissipation due to internal resistance ∴ the terminal voltage = the EMF ##\varepsilon##).
BUT, when a piece of wire is connected to the terminals, a current will flow, and surely ##Ir \neq 0## and ##V_{ab} \neq \varepsilon##? If I'm right, that means the total voltage should be different in each case (##I## changes, and therefore so would ##Ir##).
But I'm a newbie & trust the book more :) Why is the voltage the same in all 3 setups, even though the total resistance in the circuit changes when the length of wire is changed? Does it have something to do with short circuits? I don't see how connecting a wire with its own resistance to the battery terminals is any different to building a small circuit with a resistor, where the internal resistance of the battery would be relevant (going by the other examples in the book).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did they give you the internal resistance in the problem? If they didn't, you are supposed to assume that the battery is ideal.
 
If you include the "r" in the calculations, maybe it just cancels out? It would be strange for them to say the voltmeter and ammeter are ideal, and not mention the voltage source...

EDIT/ADD -- Yeah, that looks like what happened. Just include the two "r" terms on the LHS of your first equation -- what happens to them? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryaners